Desert Sands Unified School District Accepting Donations

Send your comments to DSUSD also since need support to right a wrong.

To Send Donations to an abuse victim or victim of harassment by Desert Sands Unified School District that prevented gainful employment.

Donations will help fund additional legal procedures so Stan will be able to be employed to earn a living and be able to pay rent and bills.

Also allow additional funds to be donated to www.charitywater.org that has already received millions to provide water to persons in need.

Accepting Donations to fund legal costs to tap on the shoulder of Desert Sands Unified School District to determine why DSUSD did not follow a ruling by a California State Court that ruled no wrong doing by employee.

DSUSD then continued to do everything in their power to prevent that employees future employment with any other employer. Blatantly ignoring Court Judgement.

Can only determine DSUSD actions were highly illegal when Court Judgement is not followed only because they could get away with it. Since they have the millions of dollars to impose their will even when California Courts do not agree with their opinion.

Time to ask for Donations to cover legal costs to ask more questions since DSUSD refuses to respond to inquiries. Also part of those donations will be donated to www.charitywater.org that has received millions to provide water to people in need of clean drinking water.

To Send Donations to an abuse victim or victim of harassment by DSUSD that prevented gainful employment.

Donations will help fund additional legal procedures so Stan will be able to be employed to earn a living and be able to pay rent and bills.

Also allow additional funds to be donated to www.charitywater.org that has already received millions to provide water to persons in need of clean drinking water.

Send Your Donations To:

Stan Naturelover

– stanaturelover@msn.com

– To receive paypal instructions for your donation.

To contact Stan Naturelover to use Paypal for your donations:

stanaturelover@msn.com

To contact Stan to use Paypal for your donations:

stanaturelover@msn.com

Gadsden flag

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

To this day still wonder about that persons in Desert Sands Unified School District Personnel Department mental stability since that same person could not abide by decisions made in a Court of Law of an employee Judged as no wrong doing when that same personnel department representative had asked the Court to make a ruling on false allegations being made by that same personnel department representative.

Court did not rule in favor of DSUSD. Instead ruled in favor of defendant. Court decision was no wrong doing by employee.

DSUSD still desired laying off the electrician that they could not get a court ruling in DSUSD favor.

Then took every step possible to prevent employees employment even after a Court Ruling of no wrong doing that is about as illegal as possible.

State of California made a ruling that employee was not to be discriminated against and there would be no statements by DSUSD that would hinder future employment.

DSUSD blatantly did not follow any of courts judgement.

Court ruled that layoff would be layoff due to lack of available work with no negative comments being provided to prospective employers since it was strictly a layoff due to lack of available work with no wrong doing by employee.

Courts decision was not followed or recognized by DSUSD personnel department since reports to employers continued being made that would prevent electricians employment.

DSUSD choose to follow a path that was completely illegal and against California State Law. Making reports for many years that have not reflected anything stated in that court of law indicating no wrong doing by employee.

DSUSD has not offered to make corrections to their reporting procedures to more closely reflect what was ordered in that California State Court that DSUSD had requested a California State Court to issue a decision.

When that decision did not agree with what DSUSD thought it should be DSUSD continued with their own internal procedures that were designed to prevent electrician from being employed.

Which became an illegal act after Judge having made a decision of no wrong doing that DSUSD did not agree with.

How DSUSD thought there illegal actions would be considered OK only because they are a school district is still unknown.

DSUSD illegal actions still have not been corrected.

Possibly DSUSD shredded that Court Document or filed it in the trash.

Filed that decision by a Court of Law somewhere when it did not agree with their opinion.

Since DSUSD has continued to ignore that decision to do as they please to continue to prevent electricians employment.

The Gadsden Flag

The Gadsden flag is a historical American flag with a yellow field depicting a rattlesnake coiled and ready to strike. Positioned below the snake is the legend "DONT TREAD ON ME." The flag was designed by and is named after American general and statesman Christopher Gadsden. It was also used by the Continental Marines as an early motto flag. It was the first flag ever carried into battle by the United States Marine Corps, during the American Revolution.

[edit] Snake symbolism

The timber rattlesnake and eastern diamondback rattlesnake both populate the geographical areas of the original thirteen colonies. Their use as a symbol of the American colonies can be traced back to the publications of Benjamin Franklin. In 1751, he made the first reference to the rattlesnake in a satirical commentary published in his Pennsylvania Gazette. It had been the policy of Britain to send convicted criminals to America, so Franklin suggested that they thank the British by sending rattlesnakes to England.[1]

Benjamin Franklin's "Join, or Die" cartoon

In 1754, during the French and Indian War, Franklin published his famous woodcut of a snake cut into eight sections. It represented the colonies, with New England joined together as the head and South Carolina as the tail, following their order along the coast. Under the snake was the message "Join, or Die". This was the first political cartoon published in an American newspaper.

As the American Revolution grew, the snake began to see more use as a symbol of the colonies. In 1774, Paul Revere added it to the title of his paper, the Massachusetts Spy, as a snake joined to fight a British dragon.[2] In December 1775, Benjamin Franklin published an essay in the Pennsylvania Journal under the pseudonym American Guesser in which he suggested that the rattlesnake was a good symbol for the American spirit:

"I recollected that her eye excelled in brightness, that of any other animal, and that she has no eye-lids—She may therefore be esteemed an emblem of vigilance.—She never begins an attack, nor, when once engaged, ever surrenders: She is therefore an emblem of magnanimity and true courage.—As if anxious to prevent all pretensions of quarreling with her, the weapons with which nature has furnished her, she conceals in the roof of her mouth, so that, to those who are unacquainted with her, she appears to be a most defenseless animal; and even when those weapons are shewn and extended for her defense, they appear weak and contemptible; but their wounds however small, are decisive and fatal:—Conscious of this, she never wounds till she has generously given notice, even to her enemy, and cautioned him against the danger of stepping on her.—Was I wrong, Sir, in thinking this a strong picture of the temper and conduct of America?"[3]

Desert Sands Unified School District imposed illegal discipline upon an employee then continued their harassment of same employee costing the individual hundreds of thousands of dollars due to their negligent reporting procedures.

Send your comments to DSUSD also since need support to right a wrong.

Illegal discipline imposed by Desert Sands Unified School District. Only six weeks after false allegations were made a Judge ruled no wrong doing on the part of the defendant.

Desert Sands Unified School District had requested that a California State Judge make a ruling on allegations being made by Desert Sands Unified School District to determine if defendant was guilty of any wrong doing.

That California Court Hearing determined that their had been no wrong doing by defendant and Judge made a ruling of no wrong doing by defendant. That was recorded and both parties were notified of results of that hearing that should have ended all harassment defendant was being subjected to.

Apparently Desert Sands Unified School District has their own personal Judicial system since harassment did not stop immediately after that ruling in a Court of Law. Instead DSUSD continued as though there had never been a ruling made by a California State Judge of there being no wrong doing.

Both parties were required to be at that Court Hearing to present their statements, witnesses, and any documentation to support their side of what was required for the hearing in that Court of Law with a Judge for the State of California.

Defendant found it to be a grueling procedure to present facts in defense properly before a State Judge.

It was a very stressful day of properly presenting truth and answering questions in a formal manner.

Desert Sands Unified School District only had their false allegations to present before the court.

Desert Sands Unified School District did not have witnesses to confirm their false allegations, DSUSD did not provide any documentation to confirm any validity to their false accusations. DSUSD only had their original false accusations that they were still attempting to use to continue harassing defendant.

After Judge heard all statements presented before his court he made a ruling of no wrong doing that was alleged by DSUSD that should have been the end of this struggle for Justice.

Since defendants name had been cleared and defendant could go on with his life to secure better or improved working conditions with a more responsible employer.

Was never exposed to false accusations by any other employer as the years went on. For a period of time DSUSD almost had defendant convinced that he had a personality problem to deal with.

But when that was never shown to be true since constantly received eligible for rehire at the end of each assignment when a reduction in force was required since fewer employees were needed.

That eligible for rehire often meant being back on a new job in a matter of a day or two often with the same employer at a new address or new location as determined by where work would be performed.

As time went on it became more evident that Judges knew what they were doing since there was no personality problem for defendant to deal with other than continuing to be highly proficient in his trade.

So once again it becomes a matter of DSUSD took great joy in harassing their employees and when all else failed dream up false allegations to harass them with that their false allegations could not be substantiated in a Court of Law before a California State Judge.

Then when DSUSD is asked to review their actions of continued harassment they simply choose to ignore or follow legal counsels advice of do not respond and do not stop their harassment.

From what defendant has been able to determine DSUSD has their own personal legal system or their own personal opinions that allows them to reject Judgements made by a California State Court.

That in their opinion allows them to continue using false allegations that a California State Court with a California State Judge presiding that has already made a ruling of no wrong doing as associated with those same false allegations that DSUSD continues to use verbatim as recognized when had an opportunity to see they were using the same identical false allegation.