Only explanation for Desert Sands Unified School District in La Quinta, CA. 92253 to be able to continue denying an employee employment with other employers when employee received a judgment of no wrong doing only weeks after original layoff is that their was no oversight of or no accountability by personnel department that simply shredded court judgments when it did not agree with DSUSD opinion of events.
Not obeying California State Law was of no importance to Desert Sands Unified School District as long as DSUSD was able to impose their own personal opinion of employee deserved harsh discipline in their opinion while completely ignoring decisions made in a California State Court of No Wrong Doing and do not interfere with employees future employment with other employers.
Desert Sands Unified School District in La Quinta, CA. 92253 totally disregarded what a California State Court had made a decision that said No Wrong Doing by former employee that became a defendant only weeks after layoff when non essential personnel were being laid off due to budget concerns that Desert Sands Unified School District in La Quinta, CA. 92253 was having at that time.
Multiple letters to Desert Sands Unified School District in La Quinta, CA. 92253 have not been responded to. That ask that they audit their personnel department to determine why this abuse continues.
Only explanation I have heard from anyone was from a Judge that suggested Desert Sands Unified School District in La Quinta, CA. 92253 was a hostile work environment. Since there has been no correspondence to questions posted to Desert Sands Unified School District in La Quinta, CA. 92253 requesting that they review their procedures and stop the harassment of an employee it would indicate Desert Sands Unified School District in La Quinta, CA. 92253 is still a hostile work environment.
Hostile work environment
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
A hostile work environment exists when an employee experiences workplace harassment and fears going to work because of the offensive, intimidating, or oppressive atmosphere generated by the harasser.[1]
A hostile work environment may also be created when management acts in a manner designed to make an employee quit in retaliation for some action. For example, if an employee reported safety violations at work, was injured, attempted to join a union, or in some way caused trouble for the management, then their response might be to harass and pressure the employee to quit. Actions that could be taken in furtherance of this might include inappropriate disciplinary procedures, reduced hours or wages, unreasonable scheduling or workload or similar things. The company's behavior in lieu of termination avoids the need to pay unemployment benefits.
The anti-discrimination statutes governing hostile work environment are not a general civility code. Thus, federal law does not prohibit simple teasing, offhand comments, or isolated incidents that are not extremely serious. Rather, the conduct must be so objectively offensive as to alter the conditions of the individual's employment. The conditions of employment are altered only if the harassment culminates in a tangible employment action or are sufficiently severe or pervasive.
It is only Money so who cares since it is of no importance.
What next by people that think money is of no importance. Then refuse to obey Court Order or Court Judgment..
People only spend it so what importance does it have.
Not obeying Court Judgments to prevent a person from having money must have no importance.
Paying lawyers $500.00 an hour or more with their expenses added is of no importance.
Winning a dispute in a Court of Law is of no importance since it is not obeyed by Desert Sands Unified School District management that are not accountable for their actions.
$500.00 per hour then do not obey Court Judgment in opinion of DSUSD is of no importance. In D.S.U.S.D opinion Court Judgment is of no importance.
Then reimbursing person D.S.U.S.D trashed by not obeying Court Judgment is of no importance. Cost that person hundreds of thousands of dollars is of no importance.
Out of control malicious DSUSD employees in management with no accountability no importance.
It brings up the question does DSUSD have a random drug testing program for their management personnel since Court Judgments are not obeyed, no importance.
Pissing that person off until it becomes obvious that Court Judgment has no importance.
Court Judgments are not obeyed by management at DSUSD so money is of no importance.
Not Grown Man Money. Maybe Teenager Money that does not buy million dollar houses.
It is only Money so who cares since it is of no importance.
Being found not guilty and ruled no wrong doing in a Court of Law is of no importance.
Since Desert Sands Unified School District does not obey the Laws of the State of California and refuses to obey Court Judgment of no wrong doing that indicates stop trashing that employee.
A Judge listened to and read statements made by Desert Sands Unified School District that were accusing employee of a laundry list of minor infractions.
That a drugged out power hungry management employee had prepared as reasons for an employee to be laid-off then not be eligible for employment with any other State or Federal Agency only weeks after original lay-off.
California State Judge in a Court of Law read statements made by Desert Sands Unified School District and listened to statements made by both sides of persons involved in dispute that Desert Sands Unified School District had originally requested Court to hear and make a decision on.
Employee suddenly found himself to be a defendant in a Court Proceeding as demanded by Desert Sands Unified School District that defendant was forced to attend to defend himself against false accusations that originated from some dreamed up with no basis minor infractions being perpetrated against him by drugged out Desert Sands Unified School District management personnel that were they themselves already being investigated by a grand jury and District Attorney for some serious misdeeds against persons that they were ripping off for large sums of money in a pyramid scheme that was being operated by upper management at DSUSD and College of the Desert that forced their subordinates to contribute to their pyramid scheme. That put large sums of money into the pockets of supervisory or upper management personnel at the expense of their subordinates or employees.
While also demanding early retirements of long term employees and teachers that were not contributing to the pyramid scheme at College of the Desert.
After a long expensive Court procedure that Desert Sands Unified School District had not contributed ten cents to.
Judge for State of California made a ruling of no wrong doing by employee.
That meant nothing to Desert Sands Unified School District that continued to act as though there had never been a ruling made in a Court of Law that did not support their opinion and did not support their false accusations.
Desert Sands Unified School District never skipped a beat in preventing employees employment with other employers even after a Court Judgement of No Wrong Doing by employee.
California State Judge was not influenced by DSUSD opinions since Judge was not employed by School District.
No income no money is of no importance in DSUSD opinion. Even when Court Judgement is not obeyed.
You're Laid-Off -- here's $9 million
Sacked Yahoo boss Carol Bartz lashed out at the company as she walked out the door with parting gifts most folks would envy. But as CEO perks go, $9.4 million in severance is pretty chintzy.
Earth to outgoing Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz: Yes, it's lousy to be fired. But that's no excuse for losing your cool and going on a foul-mouthed, public tirade.
Especially since Yahoo (YHOO 0.00%, news) is handing you a sweet golden parachute as you walk out the door. Bartz leaves with nearly $10 million in severance for a job she held just 30 months. That's about $78,000 for each week worked -- a parting gift a lot of laid-off employees would love to have.
It is only Money so who cares since it is of no importance. No importance to certain types of people. All others struggle for it to stay alive. Sorry you people only attempted to make the electrician dead then refused to obey a Court Judgment. What next by people that think money is of no importance.
People only spend it so what importance does it have.
Only Money who cares. Dead people do not spend it but all others struggle for it to stay alive.
Not obeying Court Judgments to prevent a person from having money must have no importance.
Paying lawyers $500.00 an hour or more with their expenses added is of no importance.
Winning a dispute in a Court of Law is of no importance since it is not obeyed by Desert Sands Unified School District management that are not accountable for their actions.
$500.00 per hour then do not obey Court Judgment in opinion of DSUSD is of no importance. In D.S.U.S.D opinion Court Judgment is of no importance.
Then reimbursing person D.S.U.S.D trashed by not obeying Court Judgment is of no importance. Cost that person hundreds of thousands of dollars is of no importance.
Out of control malicious DSUSD employees in management with no accountability no importance.
It brings up the question does DSUSD have a random drug testing program for their managemnet personnel since Court Judgmenents are not obeyed, no importance.
Pissing that person off until it becomes obvious that Court Judgment has no importance.
Court Judgments are not obeyed by management at DSUSD so money is of no importance. Not Grown Man Money. Maybe Teenager Money that does not buy million dollar houses.
It is only Money so who cares since it is of no importance.
Being found not guilty and ruled no wrong doing in a Court of Law is of no importance.
Since Desert Sands Unified School District, La Quinta, CA. 92253 does not obey the Laws of the State of California and refuses to obey Court Judgment of no wrong doing that indicates stop trashing that employee.
A Judge listened to and read statements made by Desert Sands Unified School District that were accusing employee of a laundry list of minor infractions.
That a drugged out power hungry management employee had prepared as reasons for an employee to be laid-off then not be eligible for employment with any other State or Federal Agency only weeks after original lay-off.
California State Judge in a Court of Law read statements made by Desert Sands Unified School District and listened to statements made by both sides of persons involved in dispute that Desert Sands Unified School District had originally requested Court to hear and make a decision on.
Employee suddenly found himself to be a defendant in a Court Proceeding as demanded by Desert Sands Unified School District that defendant was forced to attend to defend himself against false accusations that originated from some dreamed up with no basis minor infractions being perpetrated against him by drugged out Desert Sands Unified School District management personnel that were they themselves already being investigated by a grand jury and District Attorney for some serious misdeeds against persons that they were ripping off for large sums of money in a pyramid scheme that was being operated by upper management at DSUSD and College of the Desert that forced their subordinates to contribute to their pyramid scheme. That put large sums of money into the pockets of supervisory or upper management personnel at the expense of their subordinates or employees.
While also demanding early retirements of long term employees and teachers that were not contributing to the pyramid scheme at College of the Desert.
After a long expensive Court procedure that Desert Sands Unified School District had not contributed ten cents to.
Judge for State of California made a ruling of no wrong doing by employee.
That meant nothing to Desert Sands Unified School District that continued to act as though there had never been a ruling made in a Court of Law that did not support their opinion and did not support their false accusations.
Desert Sands Unified School District never skipped a beat in preventing employees employment with other employers even after a Court Judgement of No Wrong Doing by employee.
California State Judge was not influenced by DSUSD opinions since Judge was not employed by School District.
No income no money is of no importance in DSUSD opinion. Even when Court Judgement is not obeyed.
You're Laid-Off -- here's $9 million
Sacked Yahoo boss Carol Bartz lashed out at the company as she walked out the door with parting gifts most folks would envy. But as CEO perks go, $9.4 million in severance is pretty chintzy.
Earth to outgoing Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz: Yes, it's lousy to be fired. But that's no excuse for losing your cool and going on a foul-mouthed, public tirade.
Especially since Yahoo (YHOO 0.00%, news) is handing you a sweet golden parachute as you walk out the door. Bartz leaves with nearly $10 million in severance for a job she held just 30 months. That's about $78,000 for each week worked -- a parting gift a lot of laid-off employees would love to have.
It is only Money so who cares since it is of no importance.
Money is of no importance to certain types of people. All others struggle for it to stay alive. Sorry you people only attempted to make the electrician dead then refused to obey a Court Judgment. What next by people that think money is of no importance.
People only spend it so what importance does it have.
Only Money who cares.
Certain types of people do not spend it but all others struggle for it to stay alive.
Not obeying Court Judgments to prevent a person from having money must have no importance.
Paying lawyers $500.00 an hour or more with their expenses added is of no importance.
Winning a dispute in a Court of Law is of no importance since it is not obeyed by Desert Sands Unified School District management that are not accountable for their actions.
$500.00 per hour then do not obey Court Judgment in opinion of DSUSD is of no importance. In D.S.U.S.D opinion Court Judgment is of no importance.
Then reimbursing person D.S.U.S.D trashed by not obeying Court Judgment is of no importance. Cost that person hundreds of thousands of dollars is of no importance.
Out of control malicious DSUSD employees in management with no accountability no importance.
It brings up the question does DSUSD have a random drug testing program for their managemnet personnel since Court Judgmenents are not obeyed, no importance.
Pissing that person off until it becomes obvious that Court Judgment has no importance.
Court Judgments are not obeyed by management at DSUSD so money is of no importance.
Not Grown Man Money. Maybe Teenager Money that does not buy million dollar houses.
It is only Money so who cares since it is of no importance.
Being found not guilty and ruled no wrong doing in a Court of Law is of no importance.
Since Desert Sands Unified School District does not obey the Laws of the State of California and refuses to obey Court Judgment of no wrong doing that indicates stop trashing that employee.
A Judge listened to and read statements made by Desert Sands Unified School District that were accusing employee of a laundry list of minor infractions.
That a drugged out power hungry management employee had prepared as reasons for an employee to be laid-off then not be eligible for employment with any other State or Federal Agency only weeks after original lay-off.
California State Judge in a Court of Law read statements made by Desert Sands Unified School District and listened to statements made by both sides of persons involved in dispute that Desert Sands Unified School District had originally requested Court to hear and make a decision on.
Employee suddenly found himself to be a defendant in a Court Proceeding as demanded by Desert Sands Unified School District that defendant was forced to attend to defend himself against false accusations that originated from some dreamed up with no basis minor infractions being perpetrated against him by drugged out Desert Sands Unified School District management personnel that were they themselves already being investigated by a grand jury and District Attorney for some serious misdeeds against persons that they were ripping off for large sums of money in a pyramid scheme that was being operated by upper management at DSUSD and College of the Desert that forced their subordinates to contribute to their pyramid scheme. That put large sums of money into the pockets of supervisory or upper management personnel at the expense of their subordinates or employees.
While also demanding early retirements of long term employees and teachers that were not contributing to the pyramid scheme at College of the Desert.
After a long expensive Court procedure that Desert Sands Unified School District had not contributed ten cents to.
Judge for State of California made a ruling of no wrong doing by employee.
That meant nothing to Desert Sands Unified School District that continued to act as though there had never been a ruling made in a Court of Law that did not support their opinion and did not support their false accusations.
Desert Sands Unified School District never skipped a beat in preventing employees employment with other employers even after a Court Judgement of No Wrong Doing by employee.
California State Judge was not influenced by DSUSD opinions since Judge was not employed by School District.
No income no money is of no importance in DSUSD opinion. Even when Court Judgement is not obeyed.
You're Laid-Off -- here's $9 million
Sacked Yahoo boss Carol Bartz lashed out at the company as she walked out the door with parting gifts most folks would envy. But as CEO perks go, $9.4 million in severance is pretty chintzy.
Earth to outgoing Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz: Yes, it's lousy to be fired. But that's no excuse for losing your cool and going on a foul-mouthed, public tirade.
Especially since Yahoo (YHOO 0.00%, news) is handing you a sweet golden parachute as you walk out the door. Bartz leaves with nearly $10 million in severance for a job she held just 30 months. That's about $78,000 for each week worked -- a parting gift a lot of laid-off employees would love to have.
Hostile work environment
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
A hostile work environment exists when an employee experiences workplace harassment and fears going to work because of the offensive, intimidating, or oppressive atmosphere generated by the harasser.[1]
A hostile work environment may also be created when management acts in a manner designed to make an employee quit in retaliation for some action. For example, if an employee reported safety violations at work, was injured, attempted to join a union, or in some way caused trouble for the management, then their response might be to harass and pressure the employee to quit. Actions that could be taken in furtherance of this might include inappropriate disciplinary procedures, reduced hours or wages, unreasonable scheduling or workload or similar things. The company's behavior in lieu of termination avoids the need to pay unemployment benefits.
The anti-discrimination statutes governing hostile work environment are not a general civility code. Thus, federal law does not prohibit simple teasing, offhand comments, or isolated incidents that are not extremely serious. Rather, the conduct must be so objectively offensive as to alter the conditions of the individual's employment. The conditions of employment are altered only if the harassment culminates in a tangible employment action or are sufficiently severe or pervasive.
Hostile work environment
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
A hostile work environment exists when an employee experiences workplace harassment and fears going to work because of the offensive, intimidating, or oppressive atmosphere generated by the harasser.[1]
A hostile work environment may also be created when management acts in a manner designed to make an employee quit in retaliation for some action. For example, if an employee reported safety violations at work, was injured, attempted to join a union, or in some way caused trouble for the management, then their response might be to harass and pressure the employee to quit. Actions that could be taken in furtherance of this might include inappropriate disciplinary procedures, reduced hours or wages, unreasonable scheduling or workload or similar things. The company's behavior in lieu of termination avoids the need to pay unemployment benefits.
The anti-discrimination statutes governing hostile work environment are not a general civility code. Thus, federal law does not prohibit simple teasing, offhand comments, or isolated incidents that are not extremely serious. Rather, the conduct must be so objectively offensive as to alter the conditions of the individual's employment. The conditions of employment are altered only if the harassment culminates in a tangible employment action or are sufficiently severe or pervasive.
