Only explanation is DSUSD shredded court judgement

Only explanation for Desert Sands Unified School District in La Quinta, CA. 92253 to be able to continue denying an employee employment with other employers when employee received a judgment of no wrong doing only weeks after original layoff is that their was no oversight of or no accountability by personnel department that simply shredded court judgments when it did not agree with DSUSD opinion of events.

Not obeying California State Law was of no importance to Desert Sands Unified School District as long as DSUSD was able to impose their own personal opinion of employee deserved harsh discipline in their opinion while completely ignoring decisions made in a California State Court of No Wrong Doing and do not interfere with employees future employment with other employers.

Desert Sands Unified School District in La Quinta, CA. 92253 totally disregarded what a California State Court had made a decision that said No Wrong Doing by former employee that became a defendant only weeks after layoff when non essential personnel were being laid off due to budget concerns that Desert Sands Unified School District in La Quinta, CA. 92253 was having at that time.

Multiple letters to Desert Sands Unified School District in La Quinta, CA. 92253 have not been responded to. That ask that they audit their personnel department to determine why this abuse continues.

Only explanation I have heard from anyone was from a Judge that suggested Desert Sands Unified School District in La Quinta, CA. 92253 was a hostile work environment. Since there has been no correspondence to questions posted to Desert Sands Unified School District in La Quinta, CA. 92253 requesting that they review their procedures and stop the harassment of an employee it would indicate Desert Sands Unified School District in La Quinta, CA. 92253 is still a hostile work environment.

Hostile work environment From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search A hostile work environment exists when an employee experiences workplace harassment and fears going to work because of the offensive, intimidating, or oppressive atmosphere generated by the harasser.[1] A hostile work environment may also be created when management acts in a manner designed to make an employee quit in retaliation for some action. For example, if an employee reported safety violations at work, was injured, attempted to join a union, or in some way caused trouble for the management, then their response might be to harass and pressure the employee to quit. Actions that could be taken in furtherance of this might include inappropriate disciplinary procedures, reduced hours or wages, unreasonable scheduling or workload or similar things. The company's behavior in lieu of termination avoids the need to pay unemployment benefits. The anti-discrimination statutes governing hostile work environment are not a general civility code. Thus, federal law does not prohibit simple teasing, offhand comments, or isolated incidents that are not extremely serious. Rather, the conduct must be so objectively offensive as to alter the conditions of the individual's employment. The conditions of employment are altered only if the harassment culminates in a tangible employment action or are sufficiently severe or pervasive.

It is only Money so who cares since it is of no importance. What next by people that think money is of no importance. Then refuse to obey Court Order or Court Judgment.. People only spend it so what importance does it have. Not obeying Court Judgments to prevent a person from having money must have no importance. Paying lawyers $500.00 an hour or more with their expenses added is of no importance. Winning a dispute in a Court of Law is of no importance since it is not obeyed by Desert Sands Unified School District management that are not accountable for their actions. $500.00 per hour then do not obey Court Judgment in opinion of DSUSD is of no importance. In D.S.U.S.D opinion Court Judgment is of no importance. Then reimbursing person D.S.U.S.D trashed by not obeying Court Judgment is of no importance. Cost that person hundreds of thousands of dollars is of no importance. Out of control malicious DSUSD employees in management with no accountability no importance. It brings up the question does DSUSD have a random drug testing program for their management personnel since Court Judgments are not obeyed, no importance. Pissing that person off until it becomes obvious that Court Judgment has no importance. Court Judgments are not obeyed by management at DSUSD so money is of no importance. Not Grown Man Money. Maybe Teenager Money that does not buy million dollar houses. It is only Money so who cares since it is of no importance. Being found not guilty and ruled no wrong doing in a Court of Law is of no importance. Since Desert Sands Unified School District does not obey the Laws of the State of California and refuses to obey Court Judgment of no wrong doing that indicates stop trashing that employee. A Judge listened to and read statements made by Desert Sands Unified School District that were accusing employee of a laundry list of minor infractions. That a drugged out power hungry management employee had prepared as reasons for an employee to be laid-off then not be eligible for employment with any other State or Federal Agency only weeks after original lay-off. California State Judge in a Court of Law read statements made by Desert Sands Unified School District and listened to statements made by both sides of persons involved in dispute that Desert Sands Unified School District had originally requested Court to hear and make a decision on. Employee suddenly found himself to be a defendant in a Court Proceeding as demanded by Desert Sands Unified School District that defendant was forced to attend to defend himself against false accusations that originated from some dreamed up with no basis minor infractions being perpetrated against him by drugged out Desert Sands Unified School District management personnel that were they themselves already being investigated by a grand jury and District Attorney for some serious misdeeds against persons that they were ripping off for large sums of money in a pyramid scheme that was being operated by upper management at DSUSD and College of the Desert that forced their subordinates to contribute to their pyramid scheme. That put large sums of money into the pockets of supervisory or upper management personnel at the expense of their subordinates or employees. While also demanding early retirements of long term employees and teachers that were not contributing to the pyramid scheme at College of the Desert. After a long expensive Court procedure that Desert Sands Unified School District had not contributed ten cents to. Judge for State of California made a ruling of no wrong doing by employee. That meant nothing to Desert Sands Unified School District that continued to act as though there had never been a ruling made in a Court of Law that did not support their opinion and did not support their false accusations. 
 Desert Sands Unified School District never skipped a beat in preventing employees employment with other employers even after a Court Judgement of No Wrong Doing by employee. 
 California State Judge was not influenced by DSUSD opinions since Judge was not employed by School District. No income no money is of no importance in DSUSD opinion. Even when Court Judgement is not obeyed. You're Laid-Off -- here's $9 million Sacked Yahoo boss Carol Bartz lashed out at the company as she walked out the door with parting gifts most folks would envy. But as CEO perks go, $9.4 million in severance is pretty chintzy. Earth to outgoing Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz: Yes, it's lousy to be fired. But that's no excuse for losing your cool and going on a foul-mouthed, public tirade. Especially since Yahoo (YHOO 0.00%, news) is handing you a sweet golden parachute as you walk out the door. Bartz leaves with nearly $10 million in severance for a job she held just 30 months. That's about $78,000 for each week worked -- a parting gift a lot of laid-off employees would love to have. It is only Money so who cares since it is of no importance. No importance to certain types of people. All others struggle for it to stay alive. Sorry you people only attempted to make the electrician dead then refused to obey a Court Judgment. What next by people that think money is of no importance. People only spend it so what importance does it have. Only Money who cares. Dead people do not spend it but all others struggle for it to stay alive. Not obeying Court Judgments to prevent a person from having money must have no importance. Paying lawyers $500.00 an hour or more with their expenses added is of no importance. Winning a dispute in a Court of Law is of no importance since it is not obeyed by Desert Sands Unified School District management that are not accountable for their actions. $500.00 per hour then do not obey Court Judgment in opinion of DSUSD is of no importance. In D.S.U.S.D opinion Court Judgment is of no importance. Then reimbursing person D.S.U.S.D trashed by not obeying Court Judgment is of no importance. Cost that person hundreds of thousands of dollars is of no importance. Out of control malicious DSUSD employees in management with no accountability no importance. It brings up the question does DSUSD have a random drug testing program for their managemnet personnel since Court Judgmenents are not obeyed, no importance. Pissing that person off until it becomes obvious that Court Judgment has no importance. Court Judgments are not obeyed by management at DSUSD so money is of no importance. Not Grown Man Money. Maybe Teenager Money that does not buy million dollar houses. It is only Money so who cares since it is of no importance. Being found not guilty and ruled no wrong doing in a Court of Law is of no importance. Since Desert Sands Unified School District, La Quinta, CA. 92253 does not obey the Laws of the State of California and refuses to obey Court Judgment of no wrong doing that indicates stop trashing that employee. A Judge listened to and read statements made by Desert Sands Unified School District that were accusing employee of a laundry list of minor infractions. That a drugged out power hungry management employee had prepared as reasons for an employee to be laid-off then not be eligible for employment with any other State or Federal Agency only weeks after original lay-off. California State Judge in a Court of Law read statements made by Desert Sands Unified School District and listened to statements made by both sides of persons involved in dispute that Desert Sands Unified School District had originally requested Court to hear and make a decision on. Employee suddenly found himself to be a defendant in a Court Proceeding as demanded by Desert Sands Unified School District that defendant was forced to attend to defend himself against false accusations that originated from some dreamed up with no basis minor infractions being perpetrated against him by drugged out Desert Sands Unified School District management personnel that were they themselves already being investigated by a grand jury and District Attorney for some serious misdeeds against persons that they were ripping off for large sums of money in a pyramid scheme that was being operated by upper management at DSUSD and College of the Desert that forced their subordinates to contribute to their pyramid scheme. That put large sums of money into the pockets of supervisory or upper management personnel at the expense of their subordinates or employees. While also demanding early retirements of long term employees and teachers that were not contributing to the pyramid scheme at College of the Desert. After a long expensive Court procedure that Desert Sands Unified School District had not contributed ten cents to. Judge for State of California made a ruling of no wrong doing by employee. That meant nothing to Desert Sands Unified School District that continued to act as though there had never been a ruling made in a Court of Law that did not support their opinion and did not support their false accusations. 
 Desert Sands Unified School District never skipped a beat in preventing employees employment with other employers even after a Court Judgement of No Wrong Doing by employee. 
 California State Judge was not influenced by DSUSD opinions since Judge was not employed by School District. No income no money is of no importance in DSUSD opinion. Even when Court Judgement is not obeyed. You're Laid-Off -- here's $9 million Sacked Yahoo boss Carol Bartz lashed out at the company as she walked out the door with parting gifts most folks would envy. But as CEO perks go, $9.4 million in severance is pretty chintzy. Earth to outgoing Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz: Yes, it's lousy to be fired. But that's no excuse for losing your cool and going on a foul-mouthed, public tirade. Especially since Yahoo (YHOO 0.00%, news) is handing you a sweet golden parachute as you walk out the door. Bartz leaves with nearly $10 million in severance for a job she held just 30 months. That's about $78,000 for each week worked -- a parting gift a lot of laid-off employees would love to have. It is only Money so who cares since it is of no importance. Money is of no importance to certain types of people. All others struggle for it to stay alive. Sorry you people only attempted to make the electrician dead then refused to obey a Court Judgment. What next by people that think money is of no importance. People only spend it so what importance does it have. Only Money who cares. Certain types of people do not spend it but all others struggle for it to stay alive. Not obeying Court Judgments to prevent a person from having money must have no importance. Paying lawyers $500.00 an hour or more with their expenses added is of no importance. Winning a dispute in a Court of Law is of no importance since it is not obeyed by Desert Sands Unified School District management that are not accountable for their actions. $500.00 per hour then do not obey Court Judgment in opinion of DSUSD is of no importance. In D.S.U.S.D opinion Court Judgment is of no importance. Then reimbursing person D.S.U.S.D trashed by not obeying Court Judgment is of no importance. Cost that person hundreds of thousands of dollars is of no importance. Out of control malicious DSUSD employees in management with no accountability no importance. It brings up the question does DSUSD have a random drug testing program for their managemnet personnel since Court Judgmenents are not obeyed, no importance. Pissing that person off until it becomes obvious that Court Judgment has no importance. Court Judgments are not obeyed by management at DSUSD so money is of no importance. Not Grown Man Money. Maybe Teenager Money that does not buy million dollar houses. It is only Money so who cares since it is of no importance. Being found not guilty and ruled no wrong doing in a Court of Law is of no importance. Since Desert Sands Unified School District does not obey the Laws of the State of California and refuses to obey Court Judgment of no wrong doing that indicates stop trashing that employee. A Judge listened to and read statements made by Desert Sands Unified School District that were accusing employee of a laundry list of minor infractions. That a drugged out power hungry management employee had prepared as reasons for an employee to be laid-off then not be eligible for employment with any other State or Federal Agency only weeks after original lay-off. California State Judge in a Court of Law read statements made by Desert Sands Unified School District and listened to statements made by both sides of persons involved in dispute that Desert Sands Unified School District had originally requested Court to hear and make a decision on. Employee suddenly found himself to be a defendant in a Court Proceeding as demanded by Desert Sands Unified School District that defendant was forced to attend to defend himself against false accusations that originated from some dreamed up with no basis minor infractions being perpetrated against him by drugged out Desert Sands Unified School District management personnel that were they themselves already being investigated by a grand jury and District Attorney for some serious misdeeds against persons that they were ripping off for large sums of money in a pyramid scheme that was being operated by upper management at DSUSD and College of the Desert that forced their subordinates to contribute to their pyramid scheme. That put large sums of money into the pockets of supervisory or upper management personnel at the expense of their subordinates or employees. While also demanding early retirements of long term employees and teachers that were not contributing to the pyramid scheme at College of the Desert. After a long expensive Court procedure that Desert Sands Unified School District had not contributed ten cents to. Judge for State of California made a ruling of no wrong doing by employee. That meant nothing to Desert Sands Unified School District that continued to act as though there had never been a ruling made in a Court of Law that did not support their opinion and did not support their false accusations. Desert Sands Unified School District never skipped a beat in preventing employees employment with other employers even after a Court Judgement of No Wrong Doing by employee. California State Judge was not influenced by DSUSD opinions since Judge was not employed by School District. No income no money is of no importance in DSUSD opinion. Even when Court Judgement is not obeyed. You're Laid-Off -- here's $9 million Sacked Yahoo boss Carol Bartz lashed out at the company as she walked out the door with parting gifts most folks would envy. But as CEO perks go, $9.4 million in severance is pretty chintzy. Earth to outgoing Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz: Yes, it's lousy to be fired. But that's no excuse for losing your cool and going on a foul-mouthed, public tirade. Especially since Yahoo (YHOO 0.00%, news) is handing you a sweet golden parachute as you walk out the door. Bartz leaves with nearly $10 million in severance for a job she held just 30 months. That's about $78,000 for each week worked -- a parting gift a lot of laid-off employees would love to have.

Hostile work environment From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search A hostile work environment exists when an employee experiences workplace harassment and fears going to work because of the offensive, intimidating, or oppressive atmosphere generated by the harasser.[1] A hostile work environment may also be created when management acts in a manner designed to make an employee quit in retaliation for some action. For example, if an employee reported safety violations at work, was injured, attempted to join a union, or in some way caused trouble for the management, then their response might be to harass and pressure the employee to quit. Actions that could be taken in furtherance of this might include inappropriate disciplinary procedures, reduced hours or wages, unreasonable scheduling or workload or similar things. The company's behavior in lieu of termination avoids the need to pay unemployment benefits. The anti-discrimination statutes governing hostile work environment are not a general civility code. Thus, federal law does not prohibit simple teasing, offhand comments, or isolated incidents that are not extremely serious. Rather, the conduct must be so objectively offensive as to alter the conditions of the individual's employment. The conditions of employment are altered only if the harassment culminates in a tangible employment action or are sufficiently severe or pervasive.

Hostile work environment From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search A hostile work environment exists when an employee experiences workplace harassment and fears going to work because of the offensive, intimidating, or oppressive atmosphere generated by the harasser.[1] A hostile work environment may also be created when management acts in a manner designed to make an employee quit in retaliation for some action. For example, if an employee reported safety violations at work, was injured, attempted to join a union, or in some way caused trouble for the management, then their response might be to harass and pressure the employee to quit. Actions that could be taken in furtherance of this might include inappropriate disciplinary procedures, reduced hours or wages, unreasonable scheduling or workload or similar things. The company's behavior in lieu of termination avoids the need to pay unemployment benefits. The anti-discrimination statutes governing hostile work environment are not a general civility code. Thus, federal law does not prohibit simple teasing, offhand comments, or isolated incidents that are not extremely serious. Rather, the conduct must be so objectively offensive as to alter the conditions of the individual's employment. The conditions of employment are altered only if the harassment culminates in a tangible employment action or are sufficiently severe or pervasive.

To: Desert Sands Unified School District - Still not obeying original Court Judgment of No Wrong doing by employee. - Still preventing employment with illegal reporting. DSUSD still needs to correct their reporting procedures to obey original Court Judgment

To: Desert Sands Unified School District

From: Stanaturelover

This has been mailed to Desert Sands Unified School District Also with no response from DSUSD, and no response from anyone in legal department at DSUSD.

Originally started sending correspondence to DSUSD only weeks after Court Judgment of No Wrong Doing.

When it was recognized DSUSD was preventing employment by providing employers with false statements.

To this day nothing has changed. Desert Sands Unified School District refuses to make a reply and refuses to stop their assaults that prevent or black ball employee from State and Federal employment illegally with their statements that do not agree with what a California State Judge made a ruling on.

There was no response then and no response now for DSUSD to correct their illegal reporting to other State and Federal employers that were reviewing job applications.

Then when employed by a nuclear power plant that is a federal employer where all back ground checks had been cleared since there was no criminal record and no poor performance reported by any other former employer plus persons used as personal reference had been interviewed by that federal agency that are extensive.

Suddenly after having been employed for many weeks and receiving a substantial income that was paying rent and bills with many thousands of dollars to bank once again for hard times when jobs do not pay as well.

Was suddenly informed by nuclear plants personnel department that Desert Sands Unified School District had furnished false statements that did not obey what a Court of Law had instructed DSUSD personnel department to provide to employers.

Was instructed to contact DSUSD to request them to retract their false statements made to a federal nuclear power agency. So security clearance could once again be provided for employment.

All attempts to contact DSUSD by mail or phone to have corrections made to their reporting procedures to obey what had been decided in a court of law that had jurisdiction over DSUSD was only another expense with no results.

It can only be assumed that management or administrators were still refusing to obey a California Court Decision to continue at every opportunity possible to prevent prior employees employment.

Since DSUSD had prevented all forms of employment for two years

after lay-off due to lack of available work while refusing to obey a Court Ruling of No Wrong Doing by employee only weeks after original lay-off due to lack of available work after budget constraints had been placed on department that employee had been employed in.

Budget reductions meant fewer employees were needed since management needed the money in their budgets so they could receive another raise in pay.

Possibly also they needed to restructure their budgets since they were spending several millions of dollars on new office buildings for their administrative staff to have more comfortable surroundings.

Purchasing school books for students was of little importance since there was no money in there budget for schools to function. 

Also no money in their budget to reimburse employee for all of his legal costs that DSUSD had created for employee with their false accusations then requiring employee to attend their scheduled court appearances at employees expense. To only receive a judgment of No Wrong doing by employee.

What ever the reasoning was that DSUSD had restructured their budgets to a point where they could no longer make money available for electrician and other staff to have any work available.

A Judge for the State of California may have taken some of this into consideration or possibly some other factors since that Judge did mention off the record that he had been informed of illegal activities being performed by Desert Sands Unified School District where DSUSD was taking illegal actions against their employees.

A Court of Law that had jurisdiction over DSUSD made a decision of no wrong doing by employee.

Last sent as Merry Christmas and Happy New Year

That Judgment of not guilty would not have been made if it were not for Desert Sands Unified School District Personnel Department having requested or forced a court hearing shortly after lay off.

Due to Desert Sands Unified School District making it necessary for all parties to attend a hearing or court proceedings to determine if employee was liable in any way for the lay off from his employment.

Desert Sands Unified School District Personnel Department did not provide any witnesses or documentation to support their claims that employee had been laid off for any reason other than

lack of available work.

A legal and binding Judgment was made that employee was not guilty of any charges as presented by Desert Sands Unified School Districts Personnel Department.

That Grinch (DSUSD personnel dept.) was in charge of attempting to destroy Christmas Holidays.

So what internal crock of manure allowed them to continue their persecution of an employee is unknown and considered to be an illegal act by DSUSD once a Judgement is made in a State of California Court that has jurisdiction over DSUSD actions. That indicated no wrong doing by employee.

Since they or Desert Sands Unified School District Personnel Department were required to present their case in that California Court after that same personnel department had required that there be a court ruling made on prior employees lay off only weeks after original lay-off date.

That resulted in ruling of no wrong doing by employee.

That court ruling by a California State Judge that has jurisdiction over Desert Sands Unified School District and could not be influenced by management or not influenced by any persons representing Desert Sands Unified School District ruled against them

or ruled DSUSD accusations were false.

Judge stipulated there would be no blemishes on records of employees past work history with Desert Sands Unified School District since Desert Sands Unified School District had not provided or had not presented any evidence or witnesses to substantiate their claims of any form of wrong doing by employee before the court at a formal court proceedings.

That Official California State Court hearing was designated as requested by Desert Sands Unified School District Personnel Department to present their false accusations of any wrong doing by employee in a Court of Law that had jurisdiction over actions taken by DSUSD.

When Grinch (DSUSD personnel department) could not provide any documentation or witnesses to confirm her cut throat false accusations at that formal hearing before a California State Judge where management had no influence over outcome of hearing in front of an unbiased court proceeding where employee was ruled to have only been laid off due to lack of available work with no blemishes or no negative comments to be provided or reported to future employers.

That court ordered statement of no wrong doing and no false reporting to future employers was never obeyed by Grinch or DSUSD personnel department that had requested that formal State of California court hearing.

Instead every possible action was taken by DSUSD personnel department to prevent employees employment with other employers.

Now open your wallets and reimburse since it has and had been shown employee was not guilty.

No wrong doing by employee was a ruling made in a Court of Law that had Jurisdiction over DSUSD.

After that ruling of no wrong doing in a Court of Law that had Jurisdiction over Desert Sands Unified School District.

Desert Sands Unified School District still did everything possible to prevent employees future employment with other prospective employers.

________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________

Employee was cleared of any wrong doing and Judge suggested look for work in a less unhealthy environment. Judge suggested DSUSD was a hostile work environment that employee should not attempt to be rehired to.

A hostile work environment exists when an employee experiences workplace harassment and fears going to work because of the offensive, intimidating, or oppressive atmosphere generated by the harasser.
A hostile work environment may also be defined as when a boss or manager begins to engage in a manner designed to make you quit in retaliation for your actions. Suppose you report safety violations at work, get injured at work, attempt to join a union, complain to upper level management about a problem at work, or act as a whistle blower in any respect. Then, the company's response is to do all manner of things to make you quit, like writing you up for work rules you didn't break, reducing your hours, scheduling you for hours that are in total conflict with what you can do, or reducing your salary. The company's reaction can be viewed as creating a hostile work environment, one that makes it impossible to work and is an attempt to make you quit so that the employer does not have to pay unemployment benefits.
The anti-discrimination statutes governing hostile work environment are not a general civility code. Thus, federal law does not prohibit simple teasing, offhand comments, or isolated incidents that are not extremely serious. Rather, the conduct must be so objectively offensive as to alter the conditions of the individuals employment. The conditions of employment are altered only if the harassment culminates in a tangible employment action or is sufficiently severe or pervasive to create a hostile work environment.

To: Desert Sands Unified School District

From: Stanaturelover

This has been mailed to Desert Sands Unified School District Also with no response from DSUSD and no response from anyone in legal department at DSUSD.

Originally started sending correspondence to DSUSD only weeks after Court Judgment of No Wrong Doing.

When it was recognized DSUSD was preventing employment by providing employers with false statements.

To this day nothing has changed. Desert Sands Unified School District refuses to make a reply and refuses to stop their assaults that prevent or black ball employee from State and Federal employment illegally with their statements that do not agree with what a California State Judge made a ruling on.

There was no response then and no response now for DSUSD to correct their illegal reporting to other State and Federal employers that were reviewing job applications.

Then when employed by a nuclear power plant that is a federal employer where all back ground checks had been cleared since there was no criminal record and no poor performance reported by any other former employer plus persons used as personal reference had been interviewed by that federal agency that are extensive.

Suddenly after having been employed for many weeks and receiving a substantial income that was paying rent and bills with many thousands of dollars to bank once again for hard times when jobs do not pay as well.

Was suddenly informed by nuclear plants personnel department that Desert Sands Unified School District had furnished false statements that did not obey what a Court of Law had instructed DSUSD personnel department to provide to employers.

Was instructed to contact DSUSD to request them to retract their false statements made to a federal nuclear power agency. So security clearance could once again be provided for employment.

All attempts to contact DSUSD by mail or phone to have corrections made to their reporting procedures to obey what had been decided in a court of law that had jurisdiction over DSUSD was only another expense with no results.

It can only be assumed that management or administrators were still refusing to obey a California Court Decision to continue at every opportunity possible to prevent prior employees employment.

Since DSUSD had prevented all forms of employment for two years

after lay-off due to lack of available work while refusing to obey a Court Ruling of No Wrong Doing by employee only weeks after original lay-off due to lack of available work after budget constraints had been placed on department that employee had been employed in.

Budget reductions meant fewer employees were needed since management needed the money in their budgets so they could receive another raise in pay.

Possibly also they needed to restructure their budgets since they were spending several millions of dollars on new office buildings for their administrative staff to have more comfortable surroundings.

Purchasing school books for students was of little importance since there was no money in there budget for schools to function. 

Also no money in their budget to reimburse employee for all of his legal costs that DSUSD had created for employee with their false accusations then requiring employee to attend their scheduled court appearances at employees expense. To only receive a judgment of No Wrong doing by employee.

What ever the reasoning was that DSUSD had restructured their budgets to a point where they could no longer make money available for electrician and other staff to have any work available.

A Judge for the State of California may have taken some of this into consideration or possibly some other factors since that Judge did mention off the record that he had been informed of illegal activities being performed by Desert Sands Unified School District where DSUSD was taking illegal actions against their employees.

A Court of Law that had jurisdiction over DSUSD made a decision of no wrong doing by employee.

Last sent as Merry Christmas and Happy New Year

That Judgment of not guilty would not have been made if it were not for Desert Sands Unified School District Personnel Department having requested or forced a court hearing shortly after lay off.

Due to Desert Sands Unified School District making it necessary for all parties to attend a hearing or court proceedings to determine if employee was liable in any way for the lay off from his employment.

Desert Sands Unified School District Personnel Department did not provide any witnesses or documentation to support their claims that employee had been laid off for any reason other than

lack of available work.

A legal and binding Judgment was made that employee was not guilty of any charges as presented by Desert Sands Unified School Districts Personnel Department.

That Grinch (DSUSD personnel dept.) was in charge of attempting to destroy Christmas Holidays.

So what internal crock of manure allowed them to continue their persecution of an employee is unknown and considered to be an illegal act by DSUSD once a Judgement is made in a State of California Court that has jurisdiction over DSUSD actions. That indicated no wrong doing by employee.

Since they or Desert Sands Unified School District Personnel Department were required to present their case in that California Court after that same personnel department had required that there be a court ruling made on prior employees lay off only weeks after original lay-off date.

That resulted in ruling of no wrong doing by employee.

That court ruling by a California State Judge that has jurisdiction over Desert Sands Unified School District and could not be influenced by management or not influenced by any persons representing Desert Sands Unified School District ruled against them

or ruled DSUSD accusations were false.

Judge stipulated there would be no blemishes on records of employees past work history with Desert Sands Unified School District since Desert Sands Unified School District had not provided or had not presented any evidence or witnesses to substantiate their claims of any form of wrong doing by employee before the court at a formal court proceedings.

That Official California State Court hearing was designated as requested by Desert Sands Unified School District Personnel Department to present their false accusations of any wrong doing by employee in a Court of Law that had jurisdiction over actions taken by DSUSD.

When Grinch (DSUSD personnel department) could not provide any documentation or witnesses to confirm her cut throat false accusations at that formal hearing before a California State Judge where management had no influence over outcome of hearing in front of an unbiased court proceeding where employee was ruled to have only been laid off due to lack of available work with no blemishes or no negative comments to be provided or reported to future employers.

That court ordered statement of no wrong doing and no false reporting to future employers was never obeyed by Grinch or DSUSD personnel department that had requested that formal State of California court hearing.

Instead every possible action was taken by DSUSD personnel department to prevent employees employment with other employers.

Now open your wallets and reimburse since it has and had been shown employee was not guilty.

No wrong doing by employee was a ruling made in a Court of Law that had Jurisdiction over DSUSD.

After that ruling of no wrong doing in a Court of Law that had Jurisdiction over Desert Sands Unified School District.

Desert Sands Unified School District still did everything possible to prevent employees future employment with other prospective employers.

You're Laid-Off -- here's $9 million

Sacked Yahoo boss Carol Bartz lashed out at the company as she walked out the door with parting gifts most folks would envy. But as CEO perks go, $9.4 million in severance is pretty chintzy.

Earth to outgoing Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz: Yes, it's lousy to be fired. But that's no excuse for losing your cool and going on a foul-mouthed, public tirade.

Especially since Yahoo (YHOO 0.00%, news) is handing you a sweet golden parachute as you walk out the door. Bartz leaves with nearly $10 million in severance for a job she held just 30 months. That's about $78,000 for each week worked -- a parting gift a lot of laid-off employees would love to have.

Does DSUSD have any lawyers on retainer that can review this matter.

Does DSUSD have any lawyers on retainer that can make a reply to me on this matter.

Thank You

Put a person out in the desert with no food or water and no job plus make sure that person can not find a job since personnel department is making false reports that do not agree with what a court of law made a decision on of employee was not guilty and ruled no wrong doing.

Would any normal person simply lay down and die when a personnel department is illegally attempting to kill a person while giving each other high fives congratulating each other on how well they are at

illegally attempting to leave a person out in the desert with no food, water, or shelter and no way to earn the money to provide for those basic life giving necessities.

Personnel Department for Desert Sands Unified School District refuses to properly report court decision while leaving employee out in the desert with no food or water since employee is not allowed to have an income to provide basics of food, water, and shelter in a sweltering cold hearted desert.

Would any normal person simply lay down and die when a personnel department is illegally attempting to kill a person while giving each other high fives congratulating each other on now well they are at

illegally attempting to leave a person out in the desert with no food, water, or shelter and no way to earn the money to provide for those basic life giving necessities.

Then when Desert Sands Unified School District is contacted only weeks after a court ruling of no wrong doing and confronted DSUSD with their actions with no one in Desert Sands Unified School District making a reply and no corrections are made to their false reporting.

Apparently DSUSD was of the opinion that they were above the law or did not find in necessary to obey the laws of the State of California. DSUSD found it so entertaining to leave an employee with no food, water, or shelter in a hot unbearable desert to die from from starvation.

Would any normal person simply lay down and die when a personnel department is illegally attempting to kill a person while giving each other high fives congratulating each other on now well they are at

illegally attempting to leave a person out in the desert with no food, water, or shelter and no way to earn the money to provide for those basic life giving necessities.

Since they had not been able to disable or kill him on the job the way they had done to so many others.

The next was to leave him in the desert with no food, water, shelter and no way to get another job.

Then Desert Sands Unified School District could only whine and cry and complain that he was asking for restitution for being falsely accused and sustaining hundreds of thousands of dollars in losses that a court of law agreed with.

Was OK to leave employee out in the desert with no food, water, or shelter while Desert Sands Unified School District was making their false claims after a lay-off.

Then in a Court of Law were not able to receive a ruling that agreed with their opinion.

But had no qualms with continuing to use the same false claims to make sure employee was left out in desert with no food, water, or shelter and no chance of another job since they were black balling employee from all sources of employment.

Since DSUSD refuses to obey rulings from a court of law perhaps an opinion of what the Bible speaks of an eye for eye or a life for a life is what DSUSD has a preference to in their opinion since they have no respect for other peoples lives. Of course only an opinion.

Also can not obey the law that is an undisputed fact since DSUSD continued their attack with no regard to court rulings that said stop harassing employee.

Desert Sands Unified School District whines and cries but as no qualms about leaving a person out in the desert with with no income and no food, no water, or no shelter as though that was of no importance.

Then attempt every possible scheme to get that employee incarcerated so he could be corn holed since that was the greatest joy in statements made by person in charge of Desert Sands Unified School District Personnel Department.

That in my opinion gave people including judges the impression she, the person in charge of personnel department had attempted to be employed by law enforcement agencies but could not pass the requirements for being allowed to work for any reputable agency.

Since she was not able to be anything other than be a want to be officer of the law.

Since personnel department obeying any of the laws of the State of California was not possible for that person that worked in personnel for Desert Sands Unified School District management.

Attended a hearing before a Judge as required by DSUSD to only receive ruling of no wrong doing.

Then DSUSD personnel department refused to obey that Court Ruling of no wrong doing.

So had to settle for a job in a personnel department where she was also not qualified to be employed.

That being confirmed when that person in personnel department requested that State of California make a ruling on false allegations being made by her or management in charge of personnel department to support her desire to lay off an electrician when suddenly no work was available for that electrician after budget cuts in electricians department took place so management would be able to receive a raise in their pay since their budgets had been increased while other budgets were decreased.

Management received their pay raises while preventing any form of employment for electrician.

Some one at that School District must have enough functional gray matter in their skulls or brains to comprehend their organization did not manage to kill the electrician when they left him out in the desert with no food, no water or no shelter and no possible way to become employed to be able to acquire food, water or shelter in a cold hearted desert where DSUSD could not obey court decision that was made only weeks after original lay off with ruling of no wrong doing and not guilty of charges being made by DSUSD.

Then DSUSD did not have enough brains to stop their attack after a ruling of no wrong doing.

Forcing the employee to spend the next two years looking for a way to become employed again.

Then when employee did manage to find a way to solve that problem.

Desert Sands Unified School District once again found every way possible to prevent employee from being employed by State and Federal agencies by continuing to supply their false reports that did not reflect what a Judge had decided of no wrong doing by employee that had meant all of the false reports by DSUSD were to have stopped. False reports never stopped.

From employees experience DSUSD never had any intention of obeying any California State Laws.

DSUSD had only forced employee to attend a court hearing as another form of harassment since when Desert Sands Unified School District was not able to have any influence over that courts decision and the decision did not agree with what DSUSD wanted it to be, DSUSD simply did not obey that court decision.

That decision only weeks after electrician was laid-off. Decision in a court of law that electrician was not guilty of charges being made by DSUSD and there was a ruling of no wrong doing by electrician.

That indicated their would be no demerits on his record and nothing would or could be reported to future employers that would prevent his gainful employment.

That Judge was very knowledgeable and spelled out all of the details in his report since he recognized prior employers could be ruthless in their attempts to prevent a persons future employment when employer thought they had an axe to grind.

Prior employers axe was dull since DSUSD could not or would not present anything in a Court of Law to substantiate their claims so the

final ruling was no wrong doing by employee.

That court hearing was only eight weeks after lay-off

at employees expense once again.

To receive a ruling of no wrong doing by employee.

With that being said it is suspected that DSUSD has gone out of their way to not follow or obey that judgment of no wrong doing so they could continue an attempt to leave electrician out in the desert with no food, no water, no shelter with it not having any financial impact on DSUSD since burial expenses would be the responsibility of the Veterans Administration that takes care of the burial of Veterans.

How it is that a School District asks a court to make a decision then when it does not agree with what that School District wants the decision to be they can simply do not obey the decision.

That seems like contempt of court but guess School Districts are allowed to make their own laws as they see fit.

Which seems questionable that a school district such as Desert Sands Unified School District does not have to obey or follow California State Law.

How it is that a School District such as Desert Sands Unified School District can be sent certified mail on a yearly basis and even more often when attempt to ask about this matter when it is preventing employment.

To never receive a reply from any department at DSUSD.

Does DSUSD have any lawyers on retainer that can review this matter.

Does DSUSD have any lawyers on retainer that can make a reply to me on this matter.

Thank You

It is only Money so who cares since it is of no importance.                                                                  

What next by people that think money is of no importance.

Then refuse to obey Court Order or Court Judgment.

People only spend it so what importance does it have. 

Not obeying Court Judgments to prevent a person from having money must have no importance.

Paying lawyers $500.00 an hour or more with their expenses added is of no importance.

Winning a dispute in a Court of Law is of no importance since it is not obeyed by Desert Sands Unified School District management that are not accountable for their actions.

$500.00 per hour then do not obey Court Judgment in opinion of DSUSD is of no importance. In D.S.U.S.D opinion Court Judgment is of no importance.

Then reimbursing person D.S.U.S.D trashed by not obeying Court Judgment is of no importance. Cost that person hundreds of thousands of dollars is of no importance.

Out of control malicious DSUSD employees in management with no accountability no importance.

It brings up the question does DSUSD have a random drug testing program for their management personnel since Court Judgments are not obeyed, no importance.

Pissing that person off until it becomes obvious that Court Judgment has no importance.

Court Judgments are not obeyed by management at DSUSD so money is of no importance.

Not Grown Man Money. Maybe Teenager Money that does not buy million dollar houses.

It is only Money so who cares since it is of no importance.

Being found not guilty and ruled no wrong doing in a Court of Law is of no importance.

Since Desert Sands Unified School District does not obey the Laws of the State of California and refuses to obey Court Judgment of no wrong doing that indicates stop trashing that employee.

A Judge listened to and read statements made by Desert Sands Unified School District that were accusing employee of a laundry list of minor infractions.

That a drugged out power hungry management employee had prepared as reasons for an employee to be laid-off then not be eligible for employment with any other State or Federal Agency only weeks after original lay-off.

California State Judge in a Court of Law read statements made by Desert Sands Unified School District and listened to statements made by both sides of persons involved in dispute that Desert Sands Unified School District had originally requested Court to hear and make a decision on.

Employee suddenly found himself to be a defendant in a Court Proceeding as demanded by Desert Sands Unified School District that defendant was forced to attend to defend himself against false accusations that originated from some dreamed up with no basis minor infractions being perpetrated against him by drugged out Desert Sands Unified School District management personnel that were they themselves already being investigated by a grand jury and District Attorney for some serious misdeeds against persons that they were ripping off for large sums of money in a pyramid scheme that was being operated by upper management at DSUSD and College of the Desert that forced their subordinates to contribute to their pyramid scheme. That put large sums of money into the pockets of supervisory or upper management personnel at the expense of their subordinates or employees.

While also demanding early retirements of long term employees and teachers that were not contributing to the pyramid scheme at College of the Desert.

After a long expensive Court procedure that Desert Sands Unified School District had not contributed ten cents to.

Judge for State of California made a ruling of no wrong doing by employee.

That meant nothing to Desert Sands Unified School District that continued to act as though there had never been a ruling made in a Court of Law that did not support their opinion and did not support their false accusations or false allegations.




Desert Sands Unified School District never skipped a beat in preventing employees employment with other employers even after a Court Judgement of No Wrong Doing by employee.




California State Judge was not influenced by DSUSD opinions since Judge was not employed by School District.

No income no money is of no importance in DSUSD opinion. Even when Court Judgement is not obeyed.

You're Laid-Off -- here's $9 million

Sacked Yahoo boss Carol Bartz lashed out at the company as she walked out the door with parting gifts most folks would envy. But as CEO perks go, $9.4 million in severance is pretty chintzy.

Earth to outgoing Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz: Yes, it's lousy to be fired. But that's no excuse for losing your cool and going on a foul-mouthed, public tirade.

Especially since Yahoo (YHOO 0.00%, news) is handing you a sweet golden parachute as you walk out the door. Bartz leaves with nearly $10 million in severance for a job she held just 30 months. That's about $78,000 for each week worked -- a parting gift a lot of laid-off employees would love to have.

It is only Money so who cares since it is of no importance. No importance to certain types of people. All others struggle for it to stay alive. Sorry you people only attempted to make the electrician dead then refused to obey a Court Judgment. What next by people that think money is of no importance.

People only spend it so what importance does it have.

Only Money who cares. Dead people do not spend it but all others struggle for it to stay alive.

Not obeying Court Judgments to prevent a person from having money must have

no importance.

Paying lawyers $500.00 an hour or more with their expenses added is of

no importance.

Winning a dispute in a Court of Law is of

no importance since it is not obeyed by Desert Sands Unified School District management that are not accountable for their actions.

$500.00 per hour then do not obey Court Judgment in opinion of DSUSD is of no importance. In D.S.U.S.D opinion Court Judgment is of no importance.

Then reimbursing person D.S.U.S.D trashed by not obeying Court Judgment is of no importance. Cost that person hundreds of thousands of dollars is of

no importance.

Out of control malicious DSUSD management employees in DSUSD management with no accountability is of

no importance.

It brings up the question does DSUSD have a random drug testing program for their management personnel since Court Judgments are not obeyed,

no importance.

Pissing that person off until it becomes obvious that Court Judgment has no importance.

Court Judgments are not obeyed by management at DSUSD so money is of no importance.

Not Grown Man Money. Maybe Teenager Money that does not buy million dollar houses.

It is only Money so who cares since it is of no importance.

Being found not guilty and ruled no wrong doing in a Court of Law is of

no importance.

Since Desert Sands Unified School District does not obey the Laws of the State of California and refuses to obey Court Judgment of no wrong doing that indicates stop trashing and stop harassing that employee.

A Judge listened to and read statements made by Desert Sands Unified School District that were accusing employee of a laundry list of minor infractions that were false accusations.

That a drugged out power hungry management employee had prepared as reasons for an employee to be laid-off then not be eligible for employment with any other State or Federal Agency only weeks after original lay-off.

California State Judge in a Court of Law read statements made by Desert Sands Unified School District and listened to statements made by both sides of persons involved in dispute that Desert Sands Unified School District had originally requested Court to hear and make a decision on.

Employee suddenly found himself to be a defendant in a Court Proceeding as demanded by Desert Sands Unified School District that defendant was forced to attend to defend himself against false accusations that originated from some dreamed up with no basis minor infractions being perpetrated against him by drugged out Desert Sands Unified School District management personnel that were they themselves already being investigated by a grand jury and District Attorney for some serious misdeeds against persons that they were ripping off for large sums of money in a pyramid scheme that was being operated by upper management at DSUSD and College of the Desert that forced their subordinates to contribute to their pyramid scheme.

That put large sums of money into the pockets of supervisory or upper management personnel at the expense of their subordinates or employees.

While also demanding early retirements of long term employees and teachers that were not contributing to the pyramid scheme at College of the Desert.

After a long expensive Court procedure that Desert Sands Unified School District had not contributed ten cents to.

Judge for State of California made a ruling of no wrong doing by employee.

That meant nothing to Desert Sands Unified School District that continued to act as though there had never been a ruling made in a Court of Law that did not support their opinion and did not support their false accusations.




Desert Sands Unified School District never skipped a beat in preventing employees employment with other employers even after a Court Judgement of No Wrong Doing by employee.




California State Judge was not influenced by DSUSD opinions since Judge was not employed by School District.

No income no money is of no importance in DSUSD opinion.

Even when Court Judgement is not obeyed by DSUSD.

You're Laid-Off -- here's $9 million

Sacked Yahoo boss Carol Bartz lashed out at the company as she walked out the door with parting gifts most folks would envy. But as CEO perks go, $9.4 million in severance is pretty chintzy.

Earth to outgoing Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz: Yes, it's lousy to be fired. But that's no excuse for losing your cool and going on a foul-mouthed, public tirade.

Especially since Yahoo (YHOO 0.00%, news) is handing you a sweet golden parachute as you walk out the door. Bartz leaves with nearly $10 million in severance for a job she held just 30 months. That's about $78,000 for each week worked -- a parting gift a lot of laid-off employees would love to have.

It is only Money so who cares since it is of no importance.

Money is of no importance to certain types of people. All others struggle for it to stay alive. Sorry you people only attempted to make the electrician dead then refused to obey a Court Judgment. What next by people that think money is of no importance.

People only spend it so what importance does it have.

Only Money who cares.

Certain types of people such as dead people after burial costs do not spend it but all others struggle for it to stay alive.

Not obeying Court Judgments to prevent a person from having money must have

no importance.

Paying lawyers $500.00 an hour or more with their expenses added is of

no importance.

Winning a dispute in a Court of Law is of no importance since it is not obeyed by Desert Sands Unified School District management that are not accountable for their actions of

not obeying court judgment.

$500.00 per hour then do not obey Court Judgment in opinion of DSUSD is of no importance. In D.S.U.S.D opinion Court Judgment is of

no importance.

Then reimbursing person D.S.U.S.D trashed and harassed by not obeying Court Judgment is of

no importance.

Cost that employee hundreds of thousands of dollars is of

no importance.

Out of control malicious DSUSD employees in management with no accountability

no importance.

It brings up the question does DSUSD have a random drug testing program for their management personnel since Court Judgments are not obeyed,

no importance.

Pissing that person off until it becomes obvious that Court Judgment has no importance.

Court Judgments are not obeyed by management at DSUSD so money is of no importance.

Not Grown Man Money. Maybe Teenager Money that does not buy million dollar houses.

It is only Money so who cares since it is of no importance.

Being found not guilty and ruled no wrong doing in a Court of Law is of

no importance.

Since Desert Sands Unified School District does not obey the Laws of the State of California and refuses to obey Court Judgment of no wrong doing that indicates stop trashing and stop harassing that employee.

A Judge listened to and read statements made by Desert Sands Unified School District that were accusing employee of a laundry list of minor infractions that were false allegations.

That a drugged out power hungry management employee had prepared as reasons for an employee to be laid-off then not be eligible for employment with any other State or Federal Agency only weeks after original lay-off.

California State Judge in a Court of Law read statements made by Desert Sands Unified School District and listened to statements made by both sides of persons involved in dispute that Desert Sands Unified School District had originally requested Court to hear and make a decision on.

Employee suddenly found himself to be a defendant in a Court Proceeding as demanded by Desert Sands Unified School District that defendant was forced to attend to defend himself against false accusations that originated from some dreamed up with no basis minor infractions being perpetrated against him by drugged out Desert Sands Unified School District management personnel that were they themselves already being investigated by a grand jury and District Attorney for some serious misdeeds against persons that they were ripping off for large sums of money in a pyramid scheme that was being operated by upper management at DSUSD and College of the Desert that forced their subordinates to contribute to their pyramid scheme.

That put large sums of money into the pockets of supervisory or upper management personnel at the expense of their subordinates or employees.

While also demanding early retirements of long term employees and teachers that were not contributing to the pyramid scheme at College of the Desert.

After a long expensive Court procedure that Desert Sands Unified School District had not contributed ten cents to.

Judge for State of California made a ruling of no wrong doing by employee.

That meant nothing to Desert Sands Unified School District that continued to act as though there had never been a ruling made in a Court of Law that did not support their opinion and did not support their false accusations.




Desert Sands Unified School District never skipped a beat in preventing employees employment with other employers even after a Court Judgement of No Wrong Doing by employee.




California State Judge was not influenced by DSUSD opinions since Judge was not employed by School District.

No income no money is of no importance in DSUSD opinion. Even when Court Judgement is not obeyed.

You're Laid-Off -- here's $9 million

Sacked Yahoo boss Carol Bartz lashed out at the company as she walked out the door with parting gifts most folks would envy. But as CEO perks go, $9.4 million in severance is pretty chintzy.

Earth to outgoing Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz: Yes, it's lousy to be fired. But that's no excuse for losing your cool and going on a foul-mouthed, public tirade.

Especially since Yahoo (YHOO 0.00%, news) is handing you a sweet golden parachute as you walk out the door. Bartz leaves with nearly $10 million in severance for a job she held just 30 months. That's about $78,000 for each week worked -- a parting gift a lot of laid-off employees would love to have.