To: Desert Sands Unified School District - Still not obeying original Court Judgment of No Wrong doing by employee. - Still preventing employment with illegal reporting. DSUSD still needs to correct their reporting procedures to obey original Court Judgment

To: Desert Sands Unified School District

From: Stanaturelover

This has been mailed to Desert Sands Unified School District Also with no response from DSUSD, and no response from anyone in legal department at DSUSD.

Originally started sending correspondence to DSUSD only weeks after Court Judgment of No Wrong Doing.

When it was recognized DSUSD was preventing employment by providing employers with false statements.

To this day nothing has changed. Desert Sands Unified School District refuses to make a reply and refuses to stop their assaults that prevent or black ball employee from State and Federal employment illegally with their statements that do not agree with what a California State Judge made a ruling on.

There was no response then and no response now for DSUSD to correct their illegal reporting to other State and Federal employers that were reviewing job applications.

Then when employed by a nuclear power plant that is a federal employer where all back ground checks had been cleared since there was no criminal record and no poor performance reported by any other former employer plus persons used as personal reference had been interviewed by that federal agency that are extensive.

Suddenly after having been employed for many weeks and receiving a substantial income that was paying rent and bills with many thousands of dollars to bank once again for hard times when jobs do not pay as well.

Was suddenly informed by nuclear plants personnel department that Desert Sands Unified School District had furnished false statements that did not obey what a Court of Law had instructed DSUSD personnel department to provide to employers.

Was instructed to contact DSUSD to request them to retract their false statements made to a federal nuclear power agency. So security clearance could once again be provided for employment.

All attempts to contact DSUSD by mail or phone to have corrections made to their reporting procedures to obey what had been decided in a court of law that had jurisdiction over DSUSD was only another expense with no results.

It can only be assumed that management or administrators were still refusing to obey a California Court Decision to continue at every opportunity possible to prevent prior employees employment.

Since DSUSD had prevented all forms of employment for two years

after lay-off due to lack of available work while refusing to obey a Court Ruling of No Wrong Doing by employee only weeks after original lay-off due to lack of available work after budget constraints had been placed on department that employee had been employed in.

Budget reductions meant fewer employees were needed since management needed the money in their budgets so they could receive another raise in pay.

Possibly also they needed to restructure their budgets since they were spending several millions of dollars on new office buildings for their administrative staff to have more comfortable surroundings.

Purchasing school books for students was of little importance since there was no money in there budget for schools to function. 

Also no money in their budget to reimburse employee for all of his legal costs that DSUSD had created for employee with their false accusations then requiring employee to attend their scheduled court appearances at employees expense. To only receive a judgment of No Wrong doing by employee.

What ever the reasoning was that DSUSD had restructured their budgets to a point where they could no longer make money available for electrician and other staff to have any work available.

A Judge for the State of California may have taken some of this into consideration or possibly some other factors since that Judge did mention off the record that he had been informed of illegal activities being performed by Desert Sands Unified School District where DSUSD was taking illegal actions against their employees.

A Court of Law that had jurisdiction over DSUSD made a decision of no wrong doing by employee.

Last sent as Merry Christmas and Happy New Year

That Judgment of not guilty would not have been made if it were not for Desert Sands Unified School District Personnel Department having requested or forced a court hearing shortly after lay off.

Due to Desert Sands Unified School District making it necessary for all parties to attend a hearing or court proceedings to determine if employee was liable in any way for the lay off from his employment.

Desert Sands Unified School District Personnel Department did not provide any witnesses or documentation to support their claims that employee had been laid off for any reason other than

lack of available work.

A legal and binding Judgment was made that employee was not guilty of any charges as presented by Desert Sands Unified School Districts Personnel Department.

That Grinch (DSUSD personnel dept.) was in charge of attempting to destroy Christmas Holidays.

So what internal crock of manure allowed them to continue their persecution of an employee is unknown and considered to be an illegal act by DSUSD once a Judgement is made in a State of California Court that has jurisdiction over DSUSD actions. That indicated no wrong doing by employee.

Since they or Desert Sands Unified School District Personnel Department were required to present their case in that California Court after that same personnel department had required that there be a court ruling made on prior employees lay off only weeks after original lay-off date.

That resulted in ruling of no wrong doing by employee.

That court ruling by a California State Judge that has jurisdiction over Desert Sands Unified School District and could not be influenced by management or not influenced by any persons representing Desert Sands Unified School District ruled against them

or ruled DSUSD accusations were false.

Judge stipulated there would be no blemishes on records of employees past work history with Desert Sands Unified School District since Desert Sands Unified School District had not provided or had not presented any evidence or witnesses to substantiate their claims of any form of wrong doing by employee before the court at a formal court proceedings.

That Official California State Court hearing was designated as requested by Desert Sands Unified School District Personnel Department to present their false accusations of any wrong doing by employee in a Court of Law that had jurisdiction over actions taken by DSUSD.

When Grinch (DSUSD personnel department) could not provide any documentation or witnesses to confirm her cut throat false accusations at that formal hearing before a California State Judge where management had no influence over outcome of hearing in front of an unbiased court proceeding where employee was ruled to have only been laid off due to lack of available work with no blemishes or no negative comments to be provided or reported to future employers.

That court ordered statement of no wrong doing and no false reporting to future employers was never obeyed by Grinch or DSUSD personnel department that had requested that formal State of California court hearing.

Instead every possible action was taken by DSUSD personnel department to prevent employees employment with other employers.

Now open your wallets and reimburse since it has and had been shown employee was not guilty.

No wrong doing by employee was a ruling made in a Court of Law that had Jurisdiction over DSUSD.

After that ruling of no wrong doing in a Court of Law that had Jurisdiction over Desert Sands Unified School District.

Desert Sands Unified School District still did everything possible to prevent employees future employment with other prospective employers.

________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________

Employee was cleared of any wrong doing and Judge suggested look for work in a less unhealthy environment. Judge suggested DSUSD was a hostile work environment that employee should not attempt to be rehired to.

A hostile work environment exists when an employee experiences workplace harassment and fears going to work because of the offensive, intimidating, or oppressive atmosphere generated by the harasser.
A hostile work environment may also be defined as when a boss or manager begins to engage in a manner designed to make you quit in retaliation for your actions. Suppose you report safety violations at work, get injured at work, attempt to join a union, complain to upper level management about a problem at work, or act as a whistle blower in any respect. Then, the company's response is to do all manner of things to make you quit, like writing you up for work rules you didn't break, reducing your hours, scheduling you for hours that are in total conflict with what you can do, or reducing your salary. The company's reaction can be viewed as creating a hostile work environment, one that makes it impossible to work and is an attempt to make you quit so that the employer does not have to pay unemployment benefits.
The anti-discrimination statutes governing hostile work environment are not a general civility code. Thus, federal law does not prohibit simple teasing, offhand comments, or isolated incidents that are not extremely serious. Rather, the conduct must be so objectively offensive as to alter the conditions of the individuals employment. The conditions of employment are altered only if the harassment culminates in a tangible employment action or is sufficiently severe or pervasive to create a hostile work environment.

To: Desert Sands Unified School District

From: Stanaturelover

This has been mailed to Desert Sands Unified School District Also with no response from DSUSD and no response from anyone in legal department at DSUSD.

Originally started sending correspondence to DSUSD only weeks after Court Judgment of No Wrong Doing.

When it was recognized DSUSD was preventing employment by providing employers with false statements.

To this day nothing has changed. Desert Sands Unified School District refuses to make a reply and refuses to stop their assaults that prevent or black ball employee from State and Federal employment illegally with their statements that do not agree with what a California State Judge made a ruling on.

There was no response then and no response now for DSUSD to correct their illegal reporting to other State and Federal employers that were reviewing job applications.

Then when employed by a nuclear power plant that is a federal employer where all back ground checks had been cleared since there was no criminal record and no poor performance reported by any other former employer plus persons used as personal reference had been interviewed by that federal agency that are extensive.

Suddenly after having been employed for many weeks and receiving a substantial income that was paying rent and bills with many thousands of dollars to bank once again for hard times when jobs do not pay as well.

Was suddenly informed by nuclear plants personnel department that Desert Sands Unified School District had furnished false statements that did not obey what a Court of Law had instructed DSUSD personnel department to provide to employers.

Was instructed to contact DSUSD to request them to retract their false statements made to a federal nuclear power agency. So security clearance could once again be provided for employment.

All attempts to contact DSUSD by mail or phone to have corrections made to their reporting procedures to obey what had been decided in a court of law that had jurisdiction over DSUSD was only another expense with no results.

It can only be assumed that management or administrators were still refusing to obey a California Court Decision to continue at every opportunity possible to prevent prior employees employment.

Since DSUSD had prevented all forms of employment for two years

after lay-off due to lack of available work while refusing to obey a Court Ruling of No Wrong Doing by employee only weeks after original lay-off due to lack of available work after budget constraints had been placed on department that employee had been employed in.

Budget reductions meant fewer employees were needed since management needed the money in their budgets so they could receive another raise in pay.

Possibly also they needed to restructure their budgets since they were spending several millions of dollars on new office buildings for their administrative staff to have more comfortable surroundings.

Purchasing school books for students was of little importance since there was no money in there budget for schools to function. 

Also no money in their budget to reimburse employee for all of his legal costs that DSUSD had created for employee with their false accusations then requiring employee to attend their scheduled court appearances at employees expense. To only receive a judgment of No Wrong doing by employee.

What ever the reasoning was that DSUSD had restructured their budgets to a point where they could no longer make money available for electrician and other staff to have any work available.

A Judge for the State of California may have taken some of this into consideration or possibly some other factors since that Judge did mention off the record that he had been informed of illegal activities being performed by Desert Sands Unified School District where DSUSD was taking illegal actions against their employees.

A Court of Law that had jurisdiction over DSUSD made a decision of no wrong doing by employee.

Last sent as Merry Christmas and Happy New Year

That Judgment of not guilty would not have been made if it were not for Desert Sands Unified School District Personnel Department having requested or forced a court hearing shortly after lay off.

Due to Desert Sands Unified School District making it necessary for all parties to attend a hearing or court proceedings to determine if employee was liable in any way for the lay off from his employment.

Desert Sands Unified School District Personnel Department did not provide any witnesses or documentation to support their claims that employee had been laid off for any reason other than

lack of available work.

A legal and binding Judgment was made that employee was not guilty of any charges as presented by Desert Sands Unified School Districts Personnel Department.

That Grinch (DSUSD personnel dept.) was in charge of attempting to destroy Christmas Holidays.

So what internal crock of manure allowed them to continue their persecution of an employee is unknown and considered to be an illegal act by DSUSD once a Judgement is made in a State of California Court that has jurisdiction over DSUSD actions. That indicated no wrong doing by employee.

Since they or Desert Sands Unified School District Personnel Department were required to present their case in that California Court after that same personnel department had required that there be a court ruling made on prior employees lay off only weeks after original lay-off date.

That resulted in ruling of no wrong doing by employee.

That court ruling by a California State Judge that has jurisdiction over Desert Sands Unified School District and could not be influenced by management or not influenced by any persons representing Desert Sands Unified School District ruled against them

or ruled DSUSD accusations were false.

Judge stipulated there would be no blemishes on records of employees past work history with Desert Sands Unified School District since Desert Sands Unified School District had not provided or had not presented any evidence or witnesses to substantiate their claims of any form of wrong doing by employee before the court at a formal court proceedings.

That Official California State Court hearing was designated as requested by Desert Sands Unified School District Personnel Department to present their false accusations of any wrong doing by employee in a Court of Law that had jurisdiction over actions taken by DSUSD.

When Grinch (DSUSD personnel department) could not provide any documentation or witnesses to confirm her cut throat false accusations at that formal hearing before a California State Judge where management had no influence over outcome of hearing in front of an unbiased court proceeding where employee was ruled to have only been laid off due to lack of available work with no blemishes or no negative comments to be provided or reported to future employers.

That court ordered statement of no wrong doing and no false reporting to future employers was never obeyed by Grinch or DSUSD personnel department that had requested that formal State of California court hearing.

Instead every possible action was taken by DSUSD personnel department to prevent employees employment with other employers.

Now open your wallets and reimburse since it has and had been shown employee was not guilty.

No wrong doing by employee was a ruling made in a Court of Law that had Jurisdiction over DSUSD.

After that ruling of no wrong doing in a Court of Law that had Jurisdiction over Desert Sands Unified School District.

Desert Sands Unified School District still did everything possible to prevent employees future employment with other prospective employers.