Desert Sands Unified School District imposed illegal discipline upon an employee then continued their harassment of same employee costing the individual hundreds of thousands of dollars due to their negligent reporting procedures.

Send your comments to DSUSD also since need support to right a wrong.

Illegal discipline imposed by Desert Sands Unified School District. Only six weeks after false allegations were made a Judge ruled no wrong doing on the part of the defendant.

Desert Sands Unified School District had requested that a California State Judge make a ruling on allegations being made by Desert Sands Unified School District to determine if defendant was guilty of any wrong doing.

That California Court Hearing determined that their had been no wrong doing by defendant and Judge made a ruling of no wrong doing by defendant. That was recorded and both parties were notified of results of that hearing that should have ended all harassment defendant was being subjected to.

Apparently Desert Sands Unified School District has their own personal Judicial system since harassment did not stop immediately after that ruling in a Court of Law. Instead DSUSD continued as though there had never been a ruling made by a California State Judge of there being no wrong doing.

Both parties were required to be at that Court Hearing to present their statements, witnesses, and any documentation to support their side of what was required for the hearing in that Court of Law with a Judge for the State of California.

Defendant found it to be a grueling procedure to present facts in defense properly before a State Judge.

It was a very stressful day of properly presenting truth and answering questions in a formal manner.

Desert Sands Unified School District only had their false allegations to present before the court.

Desert Sands Unified School District did not have witnesses to confirm their false allegations, DSUSD did not provide any documentation to confirm any validity to their false accusations. DSUSD only had their original false accusations that they were still attempting to use to continue harassing defendant.

After Judge heard all statements presented before his court he made a ruling of no wrong doing that was alleged by DSUSD that should have been the end of this struggle for Justice.

Since defendants name had been cleared and defendant could go on with his life to secure better or improved working conditions with a more responsible employer.

Was never exposed to false accusations by any other employer as the years went on. For a period of time DSUSD almost had defendant convinced that he had a personality problem to deal with.

But when that was never shown to be true since constantly received eligible for rehire at the end of each assignment when a reduction in force was required since fewer employees were needed.

That eligible for rehire often meant being back on a new job in a matter of a day or two often with the same employer at a new address or new location as determined by where work would be performed.

As time went on it became more evident that Judges knew what they were doing since there was no personality problem for defendant to deal with other than continuing to be highly proficient in his trade.

So once again it becomes a matter of DSUSD took great joy in harassing their employees and when all else failed dream up false allegations to harass them with that their false allegations could not be substantiated in a Court of Law before a California State Judge.

Then when DSUSD is asked to review their actions of continued harassment they simply choose to ignore or follow legal counsels advice of do not respond and do not stop their harassment.

From what defendant has been able to determine DSUSD has their own personal legal system or their own personal opinions that allows them to reject Judgements made by a California State Court.

That in their opinion allows them to continue using false allegations that a California State Court with a California State Judge presiding that has already made a ruling of no wrong doing as associated with those same false allegations that DSUSD continues to use verbatim as recognized when had an opportunity to see they were using the same identical false allegation.