Friday, October 21, 2011

Blocking employment suddenly even after Judgement of Not Guilty is no big deal only not able to pay bills

Send your comments to DSUSD also since need support to right a wrong.

Question of who provides the authority for personnel department at Desert Sands Unified School District to continue an attack on an employee after a Judge rules not guilty of all accusations being made?
Does a court judgement have no teeth in it that allows people to continue their attack?
Then when finally employed again it is proven that their false attack was truly a false attack since for many years there are no further accusations being made by any other employer that only expects work being performed to be performed in a professional manner.
That work being performed for Riverside County Schools in Riverside, California  with no problems. That work performed under an electricians union contractors supervision. That still required interaction with all levels of management at Riverside Schools in Riverside to insure work was performed to their satisfaction also.
Suddenly Riverside Schools management was a pleasant experience to have constructive conversations with concerning work they required to satisfy all aspects of work that had been contracted for their security and communications upgrade.
Subject: Who do I contact for a dispute with prior employer that Judge ruled upon with a verdict or judgement of not guilty recorded in State of California documents by a State of California Judge. That School District did not have any influence over. 
Since it was noted that anyone that School District had influence over were expected to do as School District administrators demanded. California State Judge could not be told what to do so judge made a decision on merits of evidence provided. 
Desert Sands School District could not provide any evidence that supported their accusations. Not Guilty of any wrong doing was the final decision that should have been the end of it. Why is it allowed to continue? Who allows it to continue after a judgement of not guilty? Question is: Who authorizes ?  What is the protocol ? Is there any accountability ?
Desert Sands Unified School District Administrators instead continued with their negative actions in an attempt to make their point of view known to all future employers even after a ruling of not guilty had been made.
To: info@capk.org
Many years ago was laid off from a job. Then forced to go to a hearing to determine if I would receive unemployment benefits as a defendant.
Judge ruled in my favor since employer could not or did not provide anything that had any honesty to it to the Judge in support of their claims.
Even with Judge making a ruling in my favor that should have settled the issue.
Prior employer still sent out negative reports to prospective employers blocking employment with State and Federal agency hiring.
Finally joined a union to be allowed to work for contractors that performed work on State and Federal projects.
That took a year and a half to get accomplished when accepted to that union.
Since State and federal employment was being blocked by Desert Sands Unified School District negative statements being provided to prospective employers. Even after a Judge ruled they had no evidence or witnesses to support their claims.
Then about five years later was on at a Nuclear Power Plant that required a security background check.
Once again that same prior employer provided a negative report after I had been on the job for many weeks that caused my removal from job due to their negative report. It has been a thorn in my side for many years of when will their negative reports stop since a California State Judge had found me not guilty but they still send out negative reports blocking State and Federal employment.
What do I need to provide to receive assistance with forcing that prior employer to recognize what a Judge ruled upon and stop sending out negative reports.
I have attempted to contact Desert Sands Unified School District yearly to receive no response. Certified mail does not work. Emails are not responded to. How to get them to acknowledge that a Judge ruled on this matter and did not agree with their accusations that they continue to send out to prospective employers.
Can your organization provide any assistance and if assistance is available. Who do I contact.
Thank You:

No comments:

Post a Comment