Put a person out in desert with no food, no water, no shelter not important to Desert Sands Unified School District

Does DSUSD have any lawyers on retainer that can review this matter.

Does DSUSD have any lawyers on retainer that can make a reply to me on this matter.

Put a person out in the desert with no food or water and no job plus make sure that person can not find a job since personnel department is making false reports that do not agree with what a court of law made a decision on of employee was not guilty and ruled no wrong doing.

Would any normal person simply lay down and die when a personnel department is illegally attempting to kill a person while giving each other high fives congratulating each other on now well they are at

illegally attempting to leave a person out in the desert with no food, water, or shelter and no way to earn the money to provide for those basic life giving necessities.

Personnel Department for Desert Sands Unified School District refuses to properly report court decision while leaving employee out in the desert with no food or water since employee is not allowed to have an income to provide basics of food, water, and shelter in a sweltering cold hearted desert.

Would any normal person simply lay down and die when a personnel department is illegally attempting to kill a person while giving each other high fives congratulating each other on now well they are at

illegally attempting to leave a person out in the desert with no food, water, or shelter and no way to earn the money to provide for those basic life giving necessities.

Then when Desert Sands Unified School District is contacted only weeks after a court ruling of no wrong doing and confronted DSUSD with their actions with no one in Desert Sands Unified School District making a reply and no corrections are made to their false reporting.

Apparently DSUSD was of the opinion that they were above the law or did not find in necessary to obey the laws of the State of California. DSUSD found it so entertaining to leave an employee with no food, water, or shelter in a hot unbearable desert to die from from starvation.

Would any normal person simply lay down and die when a personnel department is illegally attempting to kill a person while giving each other high fives congratulating each other on now well they are at

illegally attempting to leave a person out in the desert with no food, water, or shelter and no way to earn the money to provide for those basic life giving necessities.

Since they had not been able to disable or kill him on the job the way they had done to so many others.

The next was to leave him in the desert with no food, water, shelter and no way to get another job.

Then Desert Sands Unified School District could only whine and cry and complain that he was asking for restitution for being falsely accused and sustaining hundreds of thousands of dollars in losses that a court of law agreed with.

Was OK to leave employee out in the desert with no food, water, or shelter while Desert Sands Unified School District was making their false claims after a lay-off.

Then in a Court of Law were not able to receive a ruling that agreed with their opinion.

But had no qualms with continuing to use the same false claims to make sure employee was left out in desert with no food, water, or shelter and no chance of another job since they were black balling employee from all sources of employment.

Since DSUSD refuses to obey rulings from a court of law perhaps an opinion of what the Bible speaks of an eye for eye or a life for a life is what DSUSD has a preference to in their opinion since they have no respect for other peoples lives. Of course only an opinion.

Also can not obey the law that is an undisputed fact since DSUSD continued their attack with no regard to court rulings that said stop harassing employee.

Desert Sands Unified School District whines and cries but as no qualms about leaving a person out in the desert with with no income and no food, water, or shelter as though that was of no importance.

Then attempt every possible scheme to get that employee incarcerated so he can be corn holed since that was the greatest joy in statements made by person in charge of Desert Sands Unified School District Personnel Department.

That in my opinion gave people including judges the impression she had attempted to be employed by law enforcement agencies but could not pass the requirements for being allowed to work for any reputable agency.

Since she was not able to be anything other than be a want to be officer of the law.

Since obeying any of the laws of the State of California was not possible for that person that worked in personnel for Desert Sands Unified School District management.

So had to settle for a job in a personnel department where she was also not qualified to be employed.

That being confirmed when that person in personnel department requested that State of California make a ruling on false allegations being made by her or management in charge of personnel department to support her desire to lay off an electrician when suddenly no work was available for that electrician after budget cuts in that department took place so management would be able to receive a raise in their pay since their budgets had been increased.

Some one at that School District must have enough functional gray matter in their skulls or brains to comprehend their organization did not manage to kill the electrician when they left him out in the desert with no food, no water or no shelter and no possible way to become employed to be able to acquire food, water or shelter in a cold hearted desert where DSUSD could not obey court decision only weeks after original lay off of no wrong doing and not guilty of charges being made by DSUSD.

Then DSUSD did not have enough brains to stop their attack after a ruling of no wrong doing.

Forcing the employee to spend the next two years looking for a way to become employed again.

Then when employee did manage to find a way to solve that problem.

Desert Sands Unified School District once again found every way possible to prevent employee from being employed by State and Federal agencies by continuing to supply their false reports that did not reflect what a Judge had decided of no wrong doing by employee that had meant all of the false reports by DSUSD were to have stopped.

From employees experience DSUSD never had any intention of obeying any California State Laws.

DSUSD had only forced employee to attend a court hearing as another form of harassment since when Desert Sands Unified School District was not able to have any influence over that courts decision and the decision did not agree with what DSUSD wanted it to be DSUSD simply did not obey that decision.

That decision only weeks after electrician was laid-off. Decision in a court of law that electrician was not guilty of charges being made by DSUSD and there was a ruling of no wrong doing by electrician.

That indicated their would be no demerits on his record and nothing would or could be reported to future employers that would prevent his gainful employment.

That Judge was very knowledgeable and spelled out all of the details in his report since he recognized prior employers could be ruthless in their attempts to prevent a persons future employment.

With that being said it is suspected that DSUSD has gone out of their way to not follow or obey that judgment so they could continue an attempt to leave electrician out in the desert with no food, no water, no shelter with it not having any financial impact on DSUSD since burial expenses would be the responsibility of the Veterans Administration that takes care of the burial of Veterans.

How it is that a School District asks a court to make a decision then when it does not agree with what that School District wants the decision to be they can simply do not obey the decision.

That seems like contempt of court but guess School Districts are allowed to make their own laws as they see fit.

Which seems questionable that a school district does not have to obey or follow California State Law.

How it is that a School District such as Desert Sands Unified School District can be sent certified mail on a yearly basis and even more often when attempt to ask about this matter when it is preventing employment. To never receive a reply from any department at DSUSD.

Does DSUSD have any lawyers on retainer that can review this matter.

Does DSUSD have any lawyers on retainer that can make a reply to me on this matter.

It is only Money so who cares since it is of no importance.                                                                  

What next by people that think money is of no importance. Then refuse to obey Court Order or Court Judgment..

People only spend it so what importance does it have. 

Not obeying Court Judgments to prevent a person from having money must have no importance.

Paying lawyers $500.00 an hour or more with their expenses added is of no importance.

Winning a dispute in a Court of Law is of no importance since it is not obeyed by Desert Sands Unified School District management that are not accountable for their actions.

$500.00 per hour then do not obey Court Judgment in opinion of DSUSD is of no importance. In D.S.U.S.D opinion Court Judgment is of no importance.

Then reimbursing person D.S.U.S.D trashed by not obeying Court Judgment is of no importance. Cost that person hundreds of thousands of dollars is of no importance.

Out of control malicious DSUSD employees in management with no accountability no importance.

It brings up the question does DSUSD have a random drug testing program for their management personnel since Court Judgments are not obeyed, no importance.

Pissing that person off until it becomes obvious that Court Judgment has no importance.

Court Judgments are not obeyed by management at DSUSD so money is of no importance.

Not Grown Man Money. Maybe Teenager Money that does not buy million dollar houses.

It is only Money so who cares since it is of no importance.

Being found not guilty and ruled no wrong doing in a Court of Law is of no importance.

Since Desert Sands Unified School District does not obey the Laws of the State of California and refuses to obey Court Judgment of no wrong doing that indicates stop trashing that employee.

A Judge listened to and read statements made by Desert Sands Unified School District that were accusing employee of a laundry list of minor infractions.

That a drugged out power hungry management employee had prepared as reasons for an employee to be laid-off then not be eligible for employment with any other State or Federal Agency only weeks after original lay-off.

California State Judge in a Court of Law read statements made by Desert Sands Unified School District and listened to statements made by both sides of persons involved in dispute that Desert Sands Unified School District had originally requested Court to hear and make a decision on.

Employee suddenly found himself to be a defendant in a Court Proceeding as demanded by Desert Sands Unified School District that defendant was forced to attend to defend himself against false accusations that originated from some dreamed up with no basis minor infractions being perpetrated against him by drugged out Desert Sands Unified School District management personnel that were they themselves already being investigated by a grand jury and District Attorney for some serious misdeeds against persons that they were ripping off for large sums of money in a pyramid scheme that was being operated by upper management at DSUSD and College of the Desert that forced their subordinates to contribute to their pyramid scheme. That put large sums of money into the pockets of supervisory or upper management personnel at the expense of their subordinates or employees.

While also demanding early retirements of long term employees and teachers that were not contributing to the pyramid scheme at College of the Desert.

After a long expensive Court procedure that Desert Sands Unified School District had not contributed ten cents to.

Judge for State of California made a ruling of no wrong doing by employee.

That meant nothing to Desert Sands Unified School District that continued to act as though there had never been a ruling made in a Court of Law that did not support their opinion and did not support their false accusations.




Desert Sands Unified School District never skipped a beat in preventing employees employment with other employers even after a Court Judgement of No Wrong Doing by employee.




California State Judge was not influenced by DSUSD opinions since Judge was not employed by School District.

No income no money is of no importance in DSUSD opinion. Even when Court Judgement is not obeyed.

You're Laid-Off -- here's $9 million

Sacked Yahoo boss Carol Bartz lashed out at the company as she walked out the door with parting gifts most folks would envy. But as CEO perks go, $9.4 million in severance is pretty chintzy.

Earth to outgoing Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz: Yes, it's lousy to be fired. But that's no excuse for losing your cool and going on a foul-mouthed, public tirade.

Especially since Yahoo (YHOO 0.00%, news) is handing you a sweet golden parachute as you walk out the door. Bartz leaves with nearly $10 million in severance for a job she held just 30 months. That's about $78,000 for each week worked -- a parting gift a lot of laid-off employees would love to have.

It is only Money so who cares since it is of no importance. No importance to certain types of people. All others struggle for it to stay alive. Sorry you people only attempted to make the electrician dead then refused to obey a Court Judgment. What next by people that think money is of no importance.

People only spend it so what importance does it have.

Only Money who cares. Dead people do not spend it but all others struggle for it to stay alive.

Not obeying Court Judgments to prevent a person from having money must have no importance.

Paying lawyers $500.00 an hour or more with their expenses added is of no importance.

Winning a dispute in a Court of Law is of no importance since it is not obeyed by Desert Sands Unified School District management that are not accountable for their actions.

$500.00 per hour then do not obey Court Judgment in opinion of DSUSD is of no importance. In D.S.U.S.D opinion Court Judgment is of no importance.

Then reimbursing person D.S.U.S.D trashed by not obeying Court Judgment is of no importance. Cost that person hundreds of thousands of dollars is of no importance.

Out of control malicious DSUSD employees in management with no accountability no importance.

It brings up the question does DSUSD have a random drug testing program for their managemnet personnel since Court Judgmenents are not obeyed, no importance.

Pissing that person off until it becomes obvious that Court Judgment has no importance.

Court Judgments are not obeyed by management at DSUSD so money is of no importance.

Not Grown Man Money. Maybe Teenager Money that does not buy million dollar houses.

It is only Money so who cares since it is of no importance.

Being found not guilty and ruled no wrong doing in a Court of Law is of no importance.

Since Desert Sands Unified School District does not obey the Laws of the State of California and refuses to obey Court Judgment of no wrong doing that indicates stop trashing that employee.

A Judge listened to and read statements made by Desert Sands Unified School District that were accusing employee of a laundry list of minor infractions.

That a drugged out power hungry management employee had prepared as reasons for an employee to be laid-off then not be eligible for employment with any other State or Federal Agency only weeks after original lay-off.

California State Judge in a Court of Law read statements made by Desert Sands Unified School District and listened to statements made by both sides of persons involved in dispute that Desert Sands Unified School District had originally requested Court to hear and make a decision on.

Employee suddenly found himself to be a defendant in a Court Proceeding as demanded by Desert Sands Unified School District that defendant was forced to attend to defend himself against false accusations that originated from some dreamed up with no basis minor infractions being perpetrated against him by drugged out Desert Sands Unified School District management personnel that were they themselves already being investigated by a grand jury and District Attorney for some serious misdeeds against persons that they were ripping off for large sums of money in a pyramid scheme that was being operated by upper management at DSUSD and College of the Desert that forced their subordinates to contribute to their pyramid scheme. That put large sums of money into the pockets of supervisory or upper management personnel at the expense of their subordinates or employees.

While also demanding early retirements of long term employees and teachers that were not contributing to the pyramid scheme at College of the Desert.

After a long expensive Court procedure that Desert Sands Unified School District had not contributed ten cents to.

Judge for State of California made a ruling of no wrong doing by employee.

That meant nothing to Desert Sands Unified School District that continued to act as though there had never been a ruling made in a Court of Law that did not support their opinion and did not support their false accusations.




Desert Sands Unified School District never skipped a beat in preventing employees employment with other employers even after a Court Judgement of No Wrong Doing by employee.




California State Judge was not influenced by DSUSD opinions since Judge was not employed by School District.

No income no money is of no importance in DSUSD opinion. Even when Court Judgement is not obeyed.

You're Laid-Off -- here's $9 million

Sacked Yahoo boss Carol Bartz lashed out at the company as she walked out the door with parting gifts most folks would envy. But as CEO perks go, $9.4 million in severance is pretty chintzy.

Earth to outgoing Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz: Yes, it's lousy to be fired. But that's no excuse for losing your cool and going on a foul-mouthed, public tirade.

Especially since Yahoo (YHOO 0.00%, news) is handing you a sweet golden parachute as you walk out the door. Bartz leaves with nearly $10 million in severance for a job she held just 30 months. That's about $78,000 for each week worked -- a parting gift a lot of laid-off employees would love to have.

It is only Money so who cares since it is of no importance.

Money is of no importance to certain types of people. All others struggle for it to stay alive. Sorry you people only attempted to make the electrician dead then refused to obey a Court Judgment. What next by people that think money is of no importance.

People only spend it so what importance does it have.

Only Money who cares.

Certain types of people do not spend it but all others struggle for it to stay alive.

Not obeying Court Judgments to prevent a person from having money must have no importance.

Paying lawyers $500.00 an hour or more with their expenses added is of no importance.

Winning a dispute in a Court of Law is of no importance since it is not obeyed by Desert Sands Unified School District management that are not accountable for their actions.

$500.00 per hour then do not obey Court Judgment in opinion of DSUSD is of no importance. In D.S.U.S.D opinion Court Judgment is of no importance.

Then reimbursing person D.S.U.S.D trashed by not obeying Court Judgment is of no importance. Cost that person hundreds of thousands of dollars is of no importance.

Out of control malicious DSUSD employees in management with no accountability no importance.

It brings up the question does DSUSD have a random drug testing program for their managemnet personnel since Court Judgmenents are not obeyed, no importance.

Pissing that person off until it becomes obvious that Court Judgment has no importance.

Court Judgments are not obeyed by management at DSUSD so money is of no importance.

Not Grown Man Money. Maybe Teenager Money that does not buy million dollar houses.

It is only Money so who cares since it is of no importance.

Being found not guilty and ruled no wrong doing in a Court of Law is of no importance.

Since Desert Sands Unified School District does not obey the Laws of the State of California and refuses to obey Court Judgment of no wrong doing that indicates stop trashing that employee.

A Judge listened to and read statements made by Desert Sands Unified School District that were accusing employee of a laundry list of minor infractions.

That a drugged out power hungry management employee had prepared as reasons for an employee to be laid-off then not be eligible for employment with any other State or Federal Agency only weeks after original lay-off.

California State Judge in a Court of Law read statements made by Desert Sands Unified School District and listened to statements made by both sides of persons involved in dispute that Desert Sands Unified School District had originally requested Court to hear and make a decision on.

Employee suddenly found himself to be a defendant in a Court Proceeding as demanded by Desert Sands Unified School District that defendant was forced to attend to defend himself against false accusations that originated from some dreamed up with no basis minor infractions being perpetrated against him by drugged out Desert Sands Unified School District management personnel that were they themselves already being investigated by a grand jury and District Attorney for some serious misdeeds against persons that they were ripping off for large sums of money in a pyramid scheme that was being operated by upper management at DSUSD and College of the Desert that forced their subordinates to contribute to their pyramid scheme. That put large sums of money into the pockets of supervisory or upper management personnel at the expense of their subordinates or employees.

While also demanding early retirements of long term employees and teachers that were not contributing to the pyramid scheme at College of the Desert.

After a long expensive Court procedure that Desert Sands Unified School District had not contributed ten cents to.

Judge for State of California made a ruling of no wrong doing by employee.

That meant nothing to Desert Sands Unified School District that continued to act as though there had never been a ruling made in a Court of Law that did not support their opinion and did not support their false accusations.




Desert Sands Unified School District never skipped a beat in preventing employees employment with other employers even after a Court Judgement of No Wrong Doing by employee.




California State Judge was not influenced by DSUSD opinions since Judge was not employed by School District.

No income no money is of no importance in DSUSD opinion. Even when Court Judgement is not obeyed.

You're Laid-Off -- here's $9 million

Sacked Yahoo boss Carol Bartz lashed out at the company as she walked out the door with parting gifts most folks would envy. But as CEO perks go, $9.4 million in severance is pretty chintzy.

Earth to outgoing Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz: Yes, it's lousy to be fired. But that's no excuse for losing your cool and going on a foul-mouthed, public tirade.

Especially since Yahoo (YHOO 0.00%, news) is handing you a sweet golden parachute as you walk out the door. Bartz leaves with nearly $10 million in severance for a job she held just 30 months. That's about $78,000 for each week worked -- a parting gift a lot of laid-off employees would love to have.