Desert Sands Unified School District beat a dead horse or continues attempting to kill a dead horse even after Court makes a ruling of no wrong doing by employee.

Desert Sands Unified School District continues to beat a dead horse or continues attempting to kill a dead horse even after Court makes a ruling of no wrong doing by employee.

Why has reporting procedure of only a lay off due to lack of available work still not being provided to prospective employers when a back ground check on employee is made. Since that was the ruling made in a Court of Law that DSUSD refuses to obey the way other law abiding citizens would be expected to do.
Does DSUSD have no respect for the Judicial System that did not agree with their false allegations.
DSUSD had their day in Court as they had requested then lost their case since DSUSD could not provide any evidence to support their false allegations.
A ruling of no wrong doing was issued that would indicate their would be no excuse to black ball or prevent employees future employment with other employers from date of lay off onward non stop.

Now Veterans Administration is offering a well paid position.
The question remains will DSUSD once again attempt to prevent that employment also with their false reporting.
That a court of law made a decision long ago of no wrong doing by employee.

Since employee had not requested any reinstatement to his prior employment in a hostile work environment that he had escaped with his life intact to celebrate his life since employer had not managed to kill him the way so many others had been killed while employed by that employer.

Those that had not been killed were disabled by on the job injuries that required them to search for employment with some other employer since they were no longer able to perform their duties to the satisfaction of DSUSD management.
So with this knowledge of what had been done to employees why would electrician even consider asking for his job back after being cleared of any wrong doing by a California State Court.

To be continued since DSUSD refuses to obey Court Rulings that majority of law abiding citizens are required to obey rulings of a State Court. DSUSD is not what a person could call law abiding since their management refuses to obey Judgments by California State Courts or Judges.

Why has reporting procedure of only a lay off due to lack of available work still not being provided to prospective employers when a back ground check on employee is made.
Since that was the ruling made in a Court of Law that DSUSD refuses to obey the way other law abiding citizens would be expected to do.

Why does DSUSD continue to beat on a dead horse continuing to create a conflict that would not exist if DSUSD were not continuing their attack on a dead horse.

Who is paying them great sums of money to continue beating on a dead horse or beating on an employee that moved on and could careless about their opinion that a Court of Law already found employee not guilty with a ruling of no wrong doing.

DSUSD forced employee to attend a Court Hearing only weeks after employees lay off notice.
That Court Hearing ruled not guilty of charges DSUSD was making against employee.
Judge issued a ruling of no wrong doing by employee that included a directive that DSUSD was to cease their attacks upon employee.

Also included in that directive was that employer was to only report a lay off due to lack of available work with no references to any claims that DSUSD was using in their attack with false allegations that were determined in a Court of Law to be false allegations.

Future employers were to only be informed that employee had been laid off due to lack of available work.

No mention of lay off for cause was any longer allowed since that issue had been addressed in a Court of Law with employee being found not guilty of all charges being perpetrated by DSUSD.
Why is it that DSUSD is allowed to not be good law abiding citizens since it has been documented for many years that DSUSD has not obeyed a ruling in a Court of Law that DSUSD had originally requested the Courts System to make a decision on.

Apparently even when a California State Court does not bow down to DSUSD influence to do as they are told to do under the threat of insubordination.
For that Court to have the audacity or gall to say DSUSD is wrong for bringing false allegations before the Court with no form of any credible evidence to support their false accusations.

Accepting money for legal fund to have this reviewed again since DSUSD refuses to obey court judgment.

All actions against the employee is supposed to stop immediately when a Court Decision of not guilty of charges being made by DSUSD becomes a decision of no wrong doing by employee with there to be no obstacles put in place by DSUSD to continue preventing employees employment with other employers.
Court recognized that hostile employers often have to be informed directly in writing that prior employer is to not in any way make any attempt to prevent an employees gainful employment.
Those statements were included in the final documents that DSUSD was issued a copy of.

Too be continued. Although it should not be unnecessary since this has already been brought before a Court of Law as originally requested by DSUSD where they lost their case.
Then continued to not obey that Court Decision by taking every opportunity available to prevent employee from being employed by other State or Federal employers or even using all in their power to limit employment in the private sector.
That was completely disregarding a California Court Decision that had found that DSUSD could not or would not confirm any of their false accusations as reasons for employees original lay off from his employment.
That ended with a decision of not guilty of false accusations being made by DSUSD with the additional decision of no wrong doing by employee.
That became a ruling of lay off due to lack of available work with no future employers to be furnished with anything more than electrician had been an employee with no negative comments included.
DSUSD had their day in Court and lost so why is it that they continue to create a conflict.
Why or what allows DSUSD to not obey a Court Ruling to continue pissing employee off.
Is DSUSD soliciting revenge by employee by continuing their assaults.

Once Again to be continued since DSUSD refuses to obey Judgment made in a Court of Law.

Why was there an all out attack launched against electrician when his only concern was being allowed to take his hard earned vacation days in the spring of the year to enjoy the splendors of Yosemite National Park along with millions of other people that visit that recreation area.
Suddenly DSUSD personnel department recognized that almost three months of vacation days had not been used. Instead of once again allowing employee to take vacation days in spring of the year as properly requested for the prior seven years to only once again to be told there was too much work back logged that required attention before any vacation time could be granted.
That was the beginning of a dispute that had gone on year after year for what became seven years of not being allowed to receive some down time from work responsibilities to go enjoy what a person performs that work for and one of the reasons for accepting employment with an organization that advertises their vacation benefits as one of the reasons for highly qualified persons to join their team of employees.
When personnel department recognized there were many months of unused vacation days it was then decided those vacation days would be used in the middle of winter months since that fit into DSUSD preferred time for vacation days to be used since too much time had been accumulated and not used. With no consideration for why those days had not been used along with no recollection in their cut throat theory of how employees should be treated when they are performing work that is so important to school district that vacation days can not be used as requested year after year for past seven years.
Then also there was 68 days of accumulated sick days that had not been used so that also became a concern to DSUSD that employee always arrived for work daily to perform his duties.
Once again why was there an all out attack launched against electrician since he was performing his assigned duties even with the underlying fact that he was seeking employment with other organizations that had reports of improved working conditions and a higher pay scale for work being performed.
Those applications would often require a lead time of a year or more from the time application for employment was made then testing to become qualified with finally an interview to determine if a prospective employee would be offered a position of employment.
Meanwhile a person has to remain employed somewhere while going through that selection process.
Remaining employed in a hostile work environment makes it even more imperative that a person not be foolish enough to not accept any reasonable offer of employment that is offered after having gone through the selection process.
That originally required application then testing then finally an interview to determine if a person is at the top of the list for being offered employment.

Now Veterans Administration is offering a well paid position. The question remains will DSUSD once again attempt to prevent that employment also with their false reporting. That a court of law made a decision long ago of no wrong doing by employee.

 Please send your comments to DSUSD also since need your support to right a wrong.

Desert Sands Unified School District  La Quinta, CA. 92253  USA

Since they refuse to obey Court Judgements made in a Court of Law.

Your comments asking them how it is that they do not have to be law abiding citizens may help in correcting their behavior of not obeying the laws that majority of other people are required to obey. 
Accepting money for legal fund to have this reviewed again since DSUSD refuses to obey court judgment.

 Please send your comments to DSUSD also since need your support to right a wrong.

Desert Sands Unified School District  La Quinta, CA. 92253  USA

Since they refuse to obey Court Judgements made in a Court of Law.

Your comments asking them how it is that they do not have to be law abiding citizens may help in correcting their behavior of not obeying the laws that majority of other people are required to obey.
Accepting money for legal fund to have this reviewed again since DSUSD refuses to obey court judgment.